Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Lovelace vs Deep Throat: Defining Fair Use
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 8, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
I came across a particularly interesting case today involving the makers of the films “Lovelace” and “Deep Throat.”
Not only did the Lovelace vs Deep Throat case require an octogenarian U.S. federal judge to sit through over a full hour of pornography, it also served to illustrate some of the finer points of fair use law. I’ll share it with you, but first, we need to discuss what constitutes fair use and why this area of the law is important.
Why do we have fair use?
While copyright law is intended to prevent an author’s work from being used without his or her permission, sometimes, it is desirable for us, as a society, to allow a limited degree of copying. Parody is a good example of this type of situation. Collectively, we feel that authors and other media producers should have the right to parody other works, but to do so requires a significant degree of copying. Without fair use laws, this would be impossible.
What constitutes fair use?
Officially, there are four factors that judges and juries consider when determining a legitimate example of fair use. The definition is relatively malleable, and only via decision in court can something definitively be considered fair use.
- The purpose and character of use – As outlined in 1994 by the Supreme Court, “transformative” use is generally accepted to be fair use. This means that the material taken from the original work has been “transformed” by the addition of new meaning or expression or that value is added as a whole to the material by its presentation in a new light. This argument contains a fine line: Simply adding new meaning or expression to the material or presenting it in a new light isn’t enough, value must be added. Because value is subjective, it can be difficult to predict how these cases will play out.
- The nature of the work – In simple terms, factual works have less protection under copyright law than fictional ones. This makes sense, in that the dissemination of facts benefits the public. While we generally agree that it is fair to enforce copyright protections for “Harry Potter,” we also generally agree that it wouldn’t be fair to extend the same protections to the depth of the Grand Canyon.
- The amount and substantiality of the portion taken – One particularly common myth held by laymen about copyright law is that there are defined limits on how much of a copyrighted work can be freely taken. While a smaller portion is generally safer to take, a particularly small portion or exposure can be considered “de minimis,” meaning that it is too small to matter, even a tiny portion can violate copyright law if it is the right portion.
- The effect upon the potential market – Because copyright law is dedicated, at least in part, to preserving the ability of a copyright holder to make money off the work, the effect of the copied material on the potential market for the original work is also considered. Note the key word “potential.” The copyright holder need not even be interested in using their work in a particular way for its use in that way to be a breach of copyright law.
Lovelace vs. Deep Throat
The case that prompted this post is a very reasonable decision by U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa to rule that the film “Lovelace” does not infringe upon the copyright held on “Deep Throat,” a pornographic film. “Lovelace” is a biopic film that depicts the life of Linda Lovelace, the primary actress in the latter film.
Griesa wrote in his decision that the heart of “Deep Throat” is “a pornographic film that in particular, focuses on one type of pornographic act,” while “Lovelace,” though it includes elements from some of the scenes in “Deep Throat,” is a clear case of transformative use. Considering the two films’ obviously different tone, focus and target audience, I am inclined to agree.
As Chairmen of the Sports & Entertainment Practice Group for Scarinci Hollenbeck, I find the subject of fair use and copyright fascinating. If you are like me and interested in this subject, check out some of my previous posts:
- The Fair Use Defense for Copyright Copying: Fair Play?
- Jersey Shore’ Producer Sued for Unfair Pay
- Cincinnati Bengals May Have Violated Fair Labor Standards Act
- Seth MacFarlane Accused of Copyright Infringement
- What are the repercussions of copyright and trademark violations?
- Is Copyright Infringement an Issue in Hollywood?
- Practices: Copyright, Trademarks
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Lovelace vs Deep Throat: Defining Fair Use
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
I came across a particularly interesting case today involving the makers of the films “Lovelace” and “Deep Throat.”
Not only did the Lovelace vs Deep Throat case require an octogenarian U.S. federal judge to sit through over a full hour of pornography, it also served to illustrate some of the finer points of fair use law. I’ll share it with you, but first, we need to discuss what constitutes fair use and why this area of the law is important.
Why do we have fair use?
While copyright law is intended to prevent an author’s work from being used without his or her permission, sometimes, it is desirable for us, as a society, to allow a limited degree of copying. Parody is a good example of this type of situation. Collectively, we feel that authors and other media producers should have the right to parody other works, but to do so requires a significant degree of copying. Without fair use laws, this would be impossible.
What constitutes fair use?
Officially, there are four factors that judges and juries consider when determining a legitimate example of fair use. The definition is relatively malleable, and only via decision in court can something definitively be considered fair use.
- The purpose and character of use – As outlined in 1994 by the Supreme Court, “transformative” use is generally accepted to be fair use. This means that the material taken from the original work has been “transformed” by the addition of new meaning or expression or that value is added as a whole to the material by its presentation in a new light. This argument contains a fine line: Simply adding new meaning or expression to the material or presenting it in a new light isn’t enough, value must be added. Because value is subjective, it can be difficult to predict how these cases will play out.
- The nature of the work – In simple terms, factual works have less protection under copyright law than fictional ones. This makes sense, in that the dissemination of facts benefits the public. While we generally agree that it is fair to enforce copyright protections for “Harry Potter,” we also generally agree that it wouldn’t be fair to extend the same protections to the depth of the Grand Canyon.
- The amount and substantiality of the portion taken – One particularly common myth held by laymen about copyright law is that there are defined limits on how much of a copyrighted work can be freely taken. While a smaller portion is generally safer to take, a particularly small portion or exposure can be considered “de minimis,” meaning that it is too small to matter, even a tiny portion can violate copyright law if it is the right portion.
- The effect upon the potential market – Because copyright law is dedicated, at least in part, to preserving the ability of a copyright holder to make money off the work, the effect of the copied material on the potential market for the original work is also considered. Note the key word “potential.” The copyright holder need not even be interested in using their work in a particular way for its use in that way to be a breach of copyright law.
Lovelace vs. Deep Throat
The case that prompted this post is a very reasonable decision by U.S. District Judge Thomas Griesa to rule that the film “Lovelace” does not infringe upon the copyright held on “Deep Throat,” a pornographic film. “Lovelace” is a biopic film that depicts the life of Linda Lovelace, the primary actress in the latter film.
Griesa wrote in his decision that the heart of “Deep Throat” is “a pornographic film that in particular, focuses on one type of pornographic act,” while “Lovelace,” though it includes elements from some of the scenes in “Deep Throat,” is a clear case of transformative use. Considering the two films’ obviously different tone, focus and target audience, I am inclined to agree.
As Chairmen of the Sports & Entertainment Practice Group for Scarinci Hollenbeck, I find the subject of fair use and copyright fascinating. If you are like me and interested in this subject, check out some of my previous posts:
- The Fair Use Defense for Copyright Copying: Fair Play?
- Jersey Shore’ Producer Sued for Unfair Pay
- Cincinnati Bengals May Have Violated Fair Labor Standards Act
- Seth MacFarlane Accused of Copyright Infringement
- What are the repercussions of copyright and trademark violations?
- Is Copyright Infringement an Issue in Hollywood?