Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Bill Seeks To Establish Cybersecurity Guidelines for IoT Devices

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: August 23, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

Bi-Partisan Bill Seeks to Establish Cybersecurity Guidelines for IoT Devices 

The U.S. Senate is currently considering the Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017, which would establish baseline cybersecurity standards for federal procurement of IoT devices. The bill would also allow security researchers to look for critical vulnerabilities in devices purchased by the government without fear of prosecution. 

Bill Seeks To Establish Cybersecurity Guidelines for IoT Devices
Photo courtesy of Stocksnap.io

The IoT bill has attracted co-sponsors from both sides of the aisle, including U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner (D-VA) and Cory Gardner (R-CO), co-chairs of the Senate Cybersecurity Caucus, along with Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Steve Daines (R-MT). The lawmakers drafted the legislation in consultation with technology and security experts from institutions such as the Berklett Cybersecurity Project of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University.

Proliferation of IoT Devices Increases Cyber Risks

The term “Internet of Things” (IoT) refers to the ability of everyday objects, from home security systems to pacemakers, to send and receive data via an Internet connection. Research firm Gartner, Inc. predicts that 8.4 billion connected things will be in use worldwide in 2017, up 31 percent from 2016. The number of IoT devices is expected to reach 20.4 billion by 2020.

As adoption of the technology grows, so do the potential data privacy and cybersecurity risks, including unauthorized access, misuse of personal information, and personal safety concerns. According to Sen. Warner, the worldwide internet outages caused last year by devices infected with the Mirai malware highlighted the need for more robust discussions about securing IoT devices. 

“While I’m tremendously excited about the innovation and productivity that Internet-of-Things devices will unleash, I have long been concerned that too many Internet-connected devices are being sold without appropriate safeguards and protections in place,” said Sen. Warner

Provisions of Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017

The Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity Improvement Act of 2017 broadly defines “Internet-Connected Device” to include any “physical object that—(A) is capable of connecting to and is in regular connection with the Internet; and (B) has computer processing capabilities that can collect, send, or receive data.” Among other provisions, the legislation would:

  • Require vendors of Internet-connected devices purchased by the federal government to ensure their devices are patchable, rely on industry standard protocols, do not use hard-coded passwords, and do not contain any known security vulnerabilities.
  • Direct the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to develop alternative network-level security requirements for devices with limited data processing and software functionality.
  • Direct the Department of Homeland Security’s National Protection and Programs Directorate to issue guidelines regarding cybersecurity coordinated vulnerability disclosure policies to be required by contractors providing connected devices to the U.S. Government.
  • Exempt cybersecurity researchers engaging in good-faith research (often called “grey hats”) from liability under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act when engaged in research pursuant to adopted coordinated vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
  • Require each executive agency to inventory all Internet-connected devices in use by the agency.

Notably, the requirements would only apply to IoT devices sold to the federal government. However, should the measure advance, additional legislation for consumer-facing devices would likely be forthcoming.

Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below for Fernando M. Pinguelo. If you have any questions about this post, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.

    No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

    Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

    Related Posts

    See all
    Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs post image

    Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs

    When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]

    Author: Marc J. Comer

    Link to post with title - "Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs"
    New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments post image

    New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments

    New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]

    Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

    Link to post with title - "New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments"
    “No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy post image

    “No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy

    A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]

    Author: Sean M. Pena

    Link to post with title - "“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy"
    Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders post image

    Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders

    Utility-scale battery energy storage systems (BESS) are becoming an increasingly important component of the electric grid throughout New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. As renewable generation expands, electricity demand increases and grid operators seek greater flexibility, battery storage can help balance supply and demand while providing additional capacity and reliability. For developers, battery storage presents […]

    Author: Nicholas Wall

    Link to post with title - "Utility-Scale Battery Storage Projects: A Legal Roadmap for Developers, Property Owners and Other Stakeholders"
    Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer post image

    Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer

    A falling out between partners can be disastrous for any business. In many cases, the partnership will not survive. If you are in an unworkable situation with your partners, it may be time to consult a partnership dispute lawyer experienced in handling partnership breakups and dissolutions before the situation deteriorates any further. It is easy […]

    Author: Jay McDaniel

    Link to post with title - "Navigating Disputes: Hire a Partnership Dispute Lawyer"
    Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know post image

    Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know

    When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]

    Author: John D. Giampolo

    Link to post with title - "Section 363 Sales in Bankruptcy: What Businesses, Lenders, and Buyers Need to Know"

    No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

    Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

    Explore What Matters Most to You.

    Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

    Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

    Let`s get in touch!

    * The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
    “If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

    Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!