
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comPartner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.com“Patent trolls,” more neutrally referred to as non-practicing entities (NPEs), are coming under intense scrutiny as courts and lawmakers look to curb abuse of patent infringement litigation.
NPEs do not directly use the patents they own to produce goods, but rather license them to other companies that do. Detractors use the term “patent trolls” because these firms often collect patent rights solely to extract licensing fees.
In the latest effort, U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-New York) is looking to provide business with more tools to defend against these patent infringement suits by expanding protections introduced under the America Invents Act (AIA). The Schumer-Kyl provision is a temporary program that established a post grant review process for covered business method patents. It allows a petitioner to request that U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) review a covered patent before a patent infringement lawsuit proceeds. Since the provision began, approximately twenty patents have been challenged through the USPTO.
Schumer’s proposal would allow more businesses to take advantage of this process, including technology start-ups. “Patent trolls are bullying New York’s technology companies, stymieing innovation, and dragging down growth,” Schumer said in a statement. “This legislation will provide small technology start-ups with the opportunity to efficiently address these claims outside of the legal system, saving billions of dollars in litigation fees.”
The proposal comes on the heels of an eye-opening study regarding just how many patent cases involve so-called “patent trolls.” Lex Machina’s review of over 12,000 cases found that patent trolls filed the majority of all federal patent infringement lawsuits in the United States in 2012. More specifically, the number of lawsuits increased from 24 percent of cases filed in 2007 to 56 percent in 2012.
If you have any questions about this legislation or would like to discuss how it may impact your business, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
If you operate a business, you need to understand how commercial zoning rules may impact you. For instance, zoning regulations can determine how you can develop a property and what type of activities your business can conduct. To ensure that you aren’t taken by surprise, it is always a good idea to consult with experienced […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
“Patent trolls,” more neutrally referred to as non-practicing entities (NPEs), are coming under intense scrutiny as courts and lawmakers look to curb abuse of patent infringement litigation.
NPEs do not directly use the patents they own to produce goods, but rather license them to other companies that do. Detractors use the term “patent trolls” because these firms often collect patent rights solely to extract licensing fees.
In the latest effort, U.S. Senator Charles Schumer (D-New York) is looking to provide business with more tools to defend against these patent infringement suits by expanding protections introduced under the America Invents Act (AIA). The Schumer-Kyl provision is a temporary program that established a post grant review process for covered business method patents. It allows a petitioner to request that U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) review a covered patent before a patent infringement lawsuit proceeds. Since the provision began, approximately twenty patents have been challenged through the USPTO.
Schumer’s proposal would allow more businesses to take advantage of this process, including technology start-ups. “Patent trolls are bullying New York’s technology companies, stymieing innovation, and dragging down growth,” Schumer said in a statement. “This legislation will provide small technology start-ups with the opportunity to efficiently address these claims outside of the legal system, saving billions of dollars in litigation fees.”
The proposal comes on the heels of an eye-opening study regarding just how many patent cases involve so-called “patent trolls.” Lex Machina’s review of over 12,000 cases found that patent trolls filed the majority of all federal patent infringement lawsuits in the United States in 2012. More specifically, the number of lawsuits increased from 24 percent of cases filed in 2007 to 56 percent in 2012.
If you have any questions about this legislation or would like to discuss how it may impact your business, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!