Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 28, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comLance Armstrong is not only facing a backlash from sponsors, teammates and federal authorities, but also disgruntled fans who purchased his autobiographies.
Following his admission to Oprah Winfrey about doping during his prestigious cycling career, the disgraced cyclist now faces a class-action lawsuit brought on by two irate readers, both of whom purchased Armstrong’s autobiographies, “It’s Not About the Bike” and “Every Second Counts.” The pair argued they were “duped,” “betrayed” and “cheated” by the seven-time Tour de France winner. Plaintiffs Rob Stutzman, who served as a deputy chief of staff for former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Jonathan Wheeler, a chef and amateur cyclist, said they were duped into purchasing the books, which describe how Armstrong overcame cancer to continue his victories and how to compete drug-free following his illness, according to BBC News.
The plaintiffs said the books were fraudulent and falsely marketed the books as fact, rather than works of fiction. Both Armstrong, and his publishers Penguin Books and Random House, are named in the lawsuit. Penguin said the lawsuit should be thrown out.
Stutzman, in particular, recounted in the court filing how the book gave him inspiration, and he had the opportunity to voice these feelings to Armstrong personally, who did not refute the veracity of the works. In a brief meeting with Armstrong, when the cyclist met with then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Stutzman wrote he “thanked Defendant Armstrong for writing his book and told him it was very inspiring. In response, Armstrong thanked Stutzman,” the BBC reports.
Both plaintiffs are demanding statutorily permissible damages, attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs.
As reprehensible as the actions of Armstrong may be, I do not believe this would give rise to an actionable claim by fans or members of the public at large. Certainly, those with privities of contract would have cause to institute litigation, including the publishers who have been named in the suit. Yet the media attention and fallout from the lawsuit may have broader implications regarding entertainment law, particularly when celebrity authors recount events and other elements of their lives that are later found to be false.
If you need a sports or entertainment attorney, please contact one of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Sports and Entertainment Law attorneys.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!