Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Allows Patriot Coal To Reject Collective Bargaining Agreements
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 13, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Patriot Coal Corp. will be permitted to reject collective bargaining agreements and reduce employee pensions and benefits for 13,000 union workers and retirees, a court ruled this week.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kathy Surratt-States granted a request from the company to stop making pension contributions and convert retiree healthcare to an outside fund, putting an end to an embittered battle between Patriot Coal and unions that began last July when the company sought bankruptcy law protection. The corporation said the changes will save $150 million a year in labor costs. The ruling will also allow it to save roughly 4,000 jobs and avoid running out of money by early next year.
In her 102-page opinion, Surratt-States noted that while Patriot Coal carries most of the blame for its insolvency, the unions themselves are partly culpable as well.
“Unions generally try to bargain for the best deal for their members, however, there is likely some responsibility to be absorbed for demanding benefits that the employer cannot realistically fund in perpetuity, particularly given the availability of sophisticated actuarial analysts and cost trend experts,” she wrote.
Although Patriot has said it will not impose the cuts until it concludes another round of negotiations, the company and the United Mine Workers of America have already undergone 12 discussions since the company filed, and have been unable to reach an accord on future projections and the fairness of labor policies on the workers, Bloomberg reports. UMWA, which called the ruling “wrong,” said it was eager to begin new negotiations immediately to find common ground on the best way to salvage worker and retiree benefits.
“As often happens under American bankruptcy law, the short-term interests of the company are valued more than the dedication and sacrifice of the workers, who actually produce the profits that make a company successful,” said UMWA President Cecil Roberts.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Judge Allows Patriot Coal To Reject Collective Bargaining Agreements
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Patriot Coal Corp. will be permitted to reject collective bargaining agreements and reduce employee pensions and benefits for 13,000 union workers and retirees, a court ruled this week.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kathy Surratt-States granted a request from the company to stop making pension contributions and convert retiree healthcare to an outside fund, putting an end to an embittered battle between Patriot Coal and unions that began last July when the company sought bankruptcy law protection. The corporation said the changes will save $150 million a year in labor costs. The ruling will also allow it to save roughly 4,000 jobs and avoid running out of money by early next year.
In her 102-page opinion, Surratt-States noted that while Patriot Coal carries most of the blame for its insolvency, the unions themselves are partly culpable as well.
“Unions generally try to bargain for the best deal for their members, however, there is likely some responsibility to be absorbed for demanding benefits that the employer cannot realistically fund in perpetuity, particularly given the availability of sophisticated actuarial analysts and cost trend experts,” she wrote.
Although Patriot has said it will not impose the cuts until it concludes another round of negotiations, the company and the United Mine Workers of America have already undergone 12 discussions since the company filed, and have been unable to reach an accord on future projections and the fairness of labor policies on the workers, Bloomberg reports. UMWA, which called the ruling “wrong,” said it was eager to begin new negotiations immediately to find common ground on the best way to salvage worker and retiree benefits.
“As often happens under American bankruptcy law, the short-term interests of the company are valued more than the dedication and sacrifice of the workers, who actually produce the profits that make a company successful,” said UMWA President Cecil Roberts.