Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Allows Detroit to Keep Casino Tax Revenue
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 8, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Detroit will be allowed to continue accessing casino tax revenue during its bankruptcy proceedings while negotiations with creditors relating to these revenues take place, a bankruptcy court has ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes authorized the struggling city to take in the casino tax revenue – which amounts to roughly $11 million each month – despite objections from bond insurer Syncora Guarantee Inc., which tried to block Detroit from using the funds. Detroit collects roughly $180 million annually from three of its casinos, Reuters reports. Of these funds, nearly $15 million is deposited each month into accounts managed by U.S. Bank to meet collateral requirements. The financial institution also sets aside $4 million each month for quarterly payments to swap counterparties, which leaves Detroit with the remaining $11 million.
However, Syncora insured the swaps as well as a portion of the Detroit pension debt associated with these transactions, and lobbied to block the city from gaining access to the casino revenue. Rhodes ruled that Syncora does not have a lien on the funds and could therefore not inhibit the city from using them, Reuters reports.
The ruling comes as good news for Detroit, which has been heavily reliant on the casino revenue to stay afloat, both before and after filing its unprecedented $18 billion bankruptcy case. Emergency manager Kevyn Orr recently spoke at a deposition, where he noted that the casino revenue has been critical in helping the city meet its most basic obligations, the Detroit Free Press reports. Orr said that the city’s finances had dwindled so low that the paychecks of some city employees were bouncing. However, the casino revenue has been a consistent and steady source of income for the ailing municipality.
Although the court’s decision was a win for Detroit, it can expect to see several other legal challenges brought against it in the coming months. Many legal analysts are watching the case closely, as investors, creditors, and insurers are expected to challenge some of the more complicated provisions of bankruptcy law.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained
How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors
Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies
How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses
Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities
On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.