Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judge Allows Detroit to Keep Casino Tax Revenue
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 8, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Detroit will be allowed to continue accessing casino tax revenue during its bankruptcy proceedings while negotiations with creditors relating to these revenues take place, a bankruptcy court has ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes authorized the struggling city to take in the casino tax revenue – which amounts to roughly $11 million each month – despite objections from bond insurer Syncora Guarantee Inc., which tried to block Detroit from using the funds. Detroit collects roughly $180 million annually from three of its casinos, Reuters reports. Of these funds, nearly $15 million is deposited each month into accounts managed by U.S. Bank to meet collateral requirements. The financial institution also sets aside $4 million each month for quarterly payments to swap counterparties, which leaves Detroit with the remaining $11 million.
However, Syncora insured the swaps as well as a portion of the Detroit pension debt associated with these transactions, and lobbied to block the city from gaining access to the casino revenue. Rhodes ruled that Syncora does not have a lien on the funds and could therefore not inhibit the city from using them, Reuters reports.
The ruling comes as good news for Detroit, which has been heavily reliant on the casino revenue to stay afloat, both before and after filing its unprecedented $18 billion bankruptcy case. Emergency manager Kevyn Orr recently spoke at a deposition, where he noted that the casino revenue has been critical in helping the city meet its most basic obligations, the Detroit Free Press reports. Orr said that the city’s finances had dwindled so low that the paychecks of some city employees were bouncing. However, the casino revenue has been a consistent and steady source of income for the ailing municipality.
Although the court’s decision was a win for Detroit, it can expect to see several other legal challenges brought against it in the coming months. Many legal analysts are watching the case closely, as investors, creditors, and insurers are expected to challenge some of the more complicated provisions of bankruptcy law.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Judge Allows Detroit to Keep Casino Tax Revenue
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Detroit will be allowed to continue accessing casino tax revenue during its bankruptcy proceedings while negotiations with creditors relating to these revenues take place, a bankruptcy court has ruled.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes authorized the struggling city to take in the casino tax revenue – which amounts to roughly $11 million each month – despite objections from bond insurer Syncora Guarantee Inc., which tried to block Detroit from using the funds. Detroit collects roughly $180 million annually from three of its casinos, Reuters reports. Of these funds, nearly $15 million is deposited each month into accounts managed by U.S. Bank to meet collateral requirements. The financial institution also sets aside $4 million each month for quarterly payments to swap counterparties, which leaves Detroit with the remaining $11 million.
However, Syncora insured the swaps as well as a portion of the Detroit pension debt associated with these transactions, and lobbied to block the city from gaining access to the casino revenue. Rhodes ruled that Syncora does not have a lien on the funds and could therefore not inhibit the city from using them, Reuters reports.
The ruling comes as good news for Detroit, which has been heavily reliant on the casino revenue to stay afloat, both before and after filing its unprecedented $18 billion bankruptcy case. Emergency manager Kevyn Orr recently spoke at a deposition, where he noted that the casino revenue has been critical in helping the city meet its most basic obligations, the Detroit Free Press reports. Orr said that the city’s finances had dwindled so low that the paychecks of some city employees were bouncing. However, the casino revenue has been a consistent and steady source of income for the ailing municipality.
Although the court’s decision was a win for Detroit, it can expect to see several other legal challenges brought against it in the coming months. Many legal analysts are watching the case closely, as investors, creditors, and insurers are expected to challenge some of the more complicated provisions of bankruptcy law.