Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 16, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhile serving on the board of directors for a company or non-profit organization is certainly an honor, it is also a significant undertaking. Directors of the board must devote time and effort to the entity, as well as assume certain legal obligations. That’s why it is imperative to know what you are getting yourself into before accepting a position on the board.

Below are several key issues that all prospective board members should consider:
Your reputation can become tied to the organization you serve, so, it is important to find out about the organization’s culture and business or mission to determine if the position will be a good fit for you. Prospective board members should also investigate the entity’s current financial health. Types of documents, if available, that may be useful include the organization’s annual report, most recent audited financial statements, and long-term strategic plan. Directors may also want to research how the organization is viewed by its clients, employees and community.
Being on a board of directors can require significant time. Before joining a board, prospective board members should ask how often the board typically meets, how formal or informal are the meetings, how often emails or calls are set up in the interim, what level of detail of review is required? Many organizations will be able to provide a written description of board member responsibilities, as well as details about board committee functions and responsibilities.
Board members are ultimately responsible as fiduciaries to the stakeholders in the organization they represent. Before joining a board of directors, you should familiarize yourself with the requirements you will have and what that entails.
A good working relationship between the board of directors and the chief executive officer is important for any successful organization. It is also important to determine whether the company and the board are committed to a culture of compliance. Both non-profits and business entities face increasing scrutiny from regulators, investors/donors, and the public. Failing to have the proper safeguards in place to address issues can lead to headaches for everyone, including board members. Public company boards, in particular, have a number of specific recent compliance issues to consider with respect to the Dodd-Frank Act, whistleblowers, and cyber security.
To protect their legal interests, prospective board members should find out whether the organization has sufficient directors and officers liability coverage in the event of a lawsuit or other legal issue. The entity’s bylaws or corporate charter should also address how the organization will indemnify its board members for legal costs. It is also important that the entity has policies and procedures in place to prevent conflicts of interest between board members and the organization. In addition to reviewing any prior litigation, it is important to find out whether the board is currently facing any lawsuits or investigations by a governmental or regulatory authority.
The bottom-line is that prospective board members should conduct their own due diligence before agreeing to serve on a board of directors. The key is to understand the risks, rewards, and required commitments before you say yes.
Are you considering accepting a position on a board of directors? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Jeffrey Cassin, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!