Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
John Hancock Loses $560 Million Tax Lawsuit
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 23, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The U.S. Tax Court recently ruled against the John Hancock Life Insurance Co. in a tax lawsuit involving hundreds of millions in deductions, Bloomberg News reports.
The court opposed John Hancock’s argument that tax deductions on a series of leveraged lease transactions – including depreciation, rental and interest expense, and transaction costs – amounting to $560 million were valid. The issue involves the insurance company’s use of lease-in-lease-out and sale-in-lease-out transactions – notably referred to as LILO and SILO. These transactions occur when companies purchase sizable assets, which are then leased to third parties for use. Most companies then adopted the practice of claiming deductions on the assets, Bloomberg notes.
Since 2008, however, the IRS has determined that these types of transactions are vehicles for improper tax avoidance. The agency claims that firms cannot legally claim deductions under federal law because they never actually owned the assets. After giving companies a chance to terminate LILOs and SILOs in exchange for 20 percent of the savings, the IRS has won a series of cases relating to these vehicles.
In John Hancock’s tax case, the IRS argued that the transactions “lacked economic substance and the substance of the transactions is not consistent with their form.” U.S. Judge Harry Haines agreed with the federal agency on the latter half of the argument, according to his court opinion.
“John Hancock did not acquire the benefits and burdens of ownership” wrote Judge Harry Haines.
However, he did not directly address the economic substance argument, which may give the company some room to appeal the decision. In an emailed statement, John Hancock alluded to the possibility of appealing the ruling.
“We continue to believe our position on the tax treatment of our lease investments was appropriate and factually distinguishable from other recent cases addressing the tax treatment of leverage lease investments,” wrote Roy Anderson, a spokesman for Bloomberg.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, Corporate Transactions & Business, Sophisticated Estate Planning & Wealth Preservation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.