Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Is the President Liable for Trademark Infringement?
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: October 27, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
A Kentucky company recently filed a lawsuit alleging that the Obama Administration is liable for trademark infringement. The dispute centers on the Department of Treasury’s planned launch of a government-sponsored retirement savings program called “myRA.”
As detailed in court documents, My Retirement Account Services LLC currently operates a website, GetMyRA.com, and has registered the corresponding trademark. The company maintains that the name of the President’s retirement program is confusingly similar to its mark, citing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s recent denial of the government’s application to register “myRA.”
The complaint specifically alleges, “Plaintiff’s customers and the public are likely to be, and have been, deceived and confused as to the source.” Accordingly, the company is seeking a permanent injunction in addition to monetary damages.
Determining the Likelihood of Confusion
In order to bring a successful trademark infringement suit, My Retirement Account Services LLC must demonstrate that the Treasury’s use of “myRA” has created a likelihood of confusion about the origin of its services. Factors that the court will consider include:
- The strength of the trademark;
- The similarity of the marks;
- The proximity of the products and their competitiveness with one another;
- The evidence that the senior user may “bridge the gap” by developing a product for sale in the market of the alleged infringer’s product;
- The evidence of actual consumer confusion;
- The evidence that the imitative mark was adopted in bad faith;
- The respective quality of the products; and
- The sophistication of consumers in the relevant market.
In support of its allegations, the company reports a steep drop off in traffic to its website. It further maintains that the government’s “myRA” mark has resulted in the “nullification of Plaintiff’s ability to promote its services using its MYRA Marks and the loss of potential customers who cannot find Plaintiff’s individual retirement account services at all or who may find the Defendant’s competing product an acceptable alternative.”
As this case highlights, intellectual property rights can have a direct impact on a company’s operations. If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss this topic, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Intellectual Property and Technology attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Is the President Liable for Trademark Infringement?
Author: Fred D. Zemel
A Kentucky company recently filed a lawsuit alleging that the Obama Administration is liable for trademark infringement. The dispute centers on the Department of Treasury’s planned launch of a government-sponsored retirement savings program called “myRA.”
As detailed in court documents, My Retirement Account Services LLC currently operates a website, GetMyRA.com, and has registered the corresponding trademark. The company maintains that the name of the President’s retirement program is confusingly similar to its mark, citing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s recent denial of the government’s application to register “myRA.”
The complaint specifically alleges, “Plaintiff’s customers and the public are likely to be, and have been, deceived and confused as to the source.” Accordingly, the company is seeking a permanent injunction in addition to monetary damages.
Determining the Likelihood of Confusion
In order to bring a successful trademark infringement suit, My Retirement Account Services LLC must demonstrate that the Treasury’s use of “myRA” has created a likelihood of confusion about the origin of its services. Factors that the court will consider include:
- The strength of the trademark;
- The similarity of the marks;
- The proximity of the products and their competitiveness with one another;
- The evidence that the senior user may “bridge the gap” by developing a product for sale in the market of the alleged infringer’s product;
- The evidence of actual consumer confusion;
- The evidence that the imitative mark was adopted in bad faith;
- The respective quality of the products; and
- The sophistication of consumers in the relevant market.
In support of its allegations, the company reports a steep drop off in traffic to its website. It further maintains that the government’s “myRA” mark has resulted in the “nullification of Plaintiff’s ability to promote its services using its MYRA Marks and the loss of potential customers who cannot find Plaintiff’s individual retirement account services at all or who may find the Defendant’s competing product an acceptable alternative.”
As this case highlights, intellectual property rights can have a direct impact on a company’s operations. If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss this topic, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Intellectual Property and Technology attorney with whom you work.