
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: February 3, 2014

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comAfter several rounds in the courtroom, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. are turning to mediation to resolve their ongoing intellectual property (IP) dispute.
As we have previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the two tech giants are among the most active in the so-called software patent wars. In 2012, a California jury concluded that Samsung infringed Apple’s patents for its iPhone and iPad devices and awarded a record $1.05 billion in damages. However, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh later ruled that jurors had erred in calculating some of the damages. She ordered a retrial, which is currently scheduled for March.
In advance of the trial, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Oh-Hyun Kwon have agreed to sit down with a mediator to address at least some of the issues in dispute. The mediation is the result of a court order requiring the two sides to hold settlement talks prior to trial.
In mediation, a neutral third party is called on to help negotiate the differences in the parties’ positions in order to lead to settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. The job of the mediator is to help the parties find common ground rather than make any binding decision regarding the dispute.
Mediation offers several advantages over litigation. Like other alternative dispute mechanisms, it is less costly and time-consuming than going to trial. Mediation is also fairly informal and therefore allows the mediator to propose creative solutions. Unlike turning a case over to a jury, mediation also allows the parties to maintain control over the ultimate resolution and maintains the confidentiality of the proceedings.
While mediation is not binding upon the parties, statistics show that about 80 percent of claims mediated in the federal courts ultimately settle. However, in this case, it is unclear if bitter rivals Apple and Samsung will be able to break the deadlock in their high-profile dispute.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how mediation may benefit your intellectual property dispute, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!