
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: February 3, 2014
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comAfter several rounds in the courtroom, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. are turning to mediation to resolve their ongoing intellectual property (IP) dispute.
As we have previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the two tech giants are among the most active in the so-called software patent wars. In 2012, a California jury concluded that Samsung infringed Apple’s patents for its iPhone and iPad devices and awarded a record $1.05 billion in damages. However, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh later ruled that jurors had erred in calculating some of the damages. She ordered a retrial, which is currently scheduled for March.
In advance of the trial, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Oh-Hyun Kwon have agreed to sit down with a mediator to address at least some of the issues in dispute. The mediation is the result of a court order requiring the two sides to hold settlement talks prior to trial.
In mediation, a neutral third party is called on to help negotiate the differences in the parties’ positions in order to lead to settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. The job of the mediator is to help the parties find common ground rather than make any binding decision regarding the dispute.
Mediation offers several advantages over litigation. Like other alternative dispute mechanisms, it is less costly and time-consuming than going to trial. Mediation is also fairly informal and therefore allows the mediator to propose creative solutions. Unlike turning a case over to a jury, mediation also allows the parties to maintain control over the ultimate resolution and maintains the confidentiality of the proceedings.
While mediation is not binding upon the parties, statistics show that about 80 percent of claims mediated in the federal courts ultimately settle. However, in this case, it is unclear if bitter rivals Apple and Samsung will be able to break the deadlock in their high-profile dispute.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how mediation may benefit your intellectual property dispute, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
After several rounds in the courtroom, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. are turning to mediation to resolve their ongoing intellectual property (IP) dispute.
As we have previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the two tech giants are among the most active in the so-called software patent wars. In 2012, a California jury concluded that Samsung infringed Apple’s patents for its iPhone and iPad devices and awarded a record $1.05 billion in damages. However, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh later ruled that jurors had erred in calculating some of the damages. She ordered a retrial, which is currently scheduled for March.
In advance of the trial, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Oh-Hyun Kwon have agreed to sit down with a mediator to address at least some of the issues in dispute. The mediation is the result of a court order requiring the two sides to hold settlement talks prior to trial.
In mediation, a neutral third party is called on to help negotiate the differences in the parties’ positions in order to lead to settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. The job of the mediator is to help the parties find common ground rather than make any binding decision regarding the dispute.
Mediation offers several advantages over litigation. Like other alternative dispute mechanisms, it is less costly and time-consuming than going to trial. Mediation is also fairly informal and therefore allows the mediator to propose creative solutions. Unlike turning a case over to a jury, mediation also allows the parties to maintain control over the ultimate resolution and maintains the confidentiality of the proceedings.
While mediation is not binding upon the parties, statistics show that about 80 percent of claims mediated in the federal courts ultimately settle. However, in this case, it is unclear if bitter rivals Apple and Samsung will be able to break the deadlock in their high-profile dispute.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how mediation may benefit your intellectual property dispute, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!