
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: February 3, 2014

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comAfter several rounds in the courtroom, Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co. are turning to mediation to resolve their ongoing intellectual property (IP) dispute.
As we have previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the two tech giants are among the most active in the so-called software patent wars. In 2012, a California jury concluded that Samsung infringed Apple’s patents for its iPhone and iPad devices and awarded a record $1.05 billion in damages. However, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh later ruled that jurors had erred in calculating some of the damages. She ordered a retrial, which is currently scheduled for March.
In advance of the trial, Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Oh-Hyun Kwon have agreed to sit down with a mediator to address at least some of the issues in dispute. The mediation is the result of a court order requiring the two sides to hold settlement talks prior to trial.
In mediation, a neutral third party is called on to help negotiate the differences in the parties’ positions in order to lead to settlement of all or some of the issues in dispute. The job of the mediator is to help the parties find common ground rather than make any binding decision regarding the dispute.
Mediation offers several advantages over litigation. Like other alternative dispute mechanisms, it is less costly and time-consuming than going to trial. Mediation is also fairly informal and therefore allows the mediator to propose creative solutions. Unlike turning a case over to a jury, mediation also allows the parties to maintain control over the ultimate resolution and maintains the confidentiality of the proceedings.
While mediation is not binding upon the parties, statistics show that about 80 percent of claims mediated in the federal courts ultimately settle. However, in this case, it is unclear if bitter rivals Apple and Samsung will be able to break the deadlock in their high-profile dispute.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss how mediation may benefit your intellectual property dispute, please contact me, Robert Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!