
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: October 10, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comBlackberry Ltd. has fallen on difficult times, and if its ongoing bid to find a buyer to take the company private fails, some analysts speculate that the company may be forced to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law.
Currently, the smartphone maker is negotiating a potential deal with Canadian insurance and investment company Fairfax Financial Holdings, which has made a $4.7 billion bid for Blackberry. Fairfax currently owns roughly 10 percent of Blackberry’s common shares. However, there is some skepticism as to whether Fairfax will be able to close the deal. The investment firm submitted a letter of intent to acquire the company, but has yet to line up the necessary financing to make the purchase.
Blackberry’s patents and licenses are currently valued at roughly $2.8 billion, leaving Fairfax to borrow roughly $2 billion to fund the buyout, Bloomberg reports.
Blackberry has been on the decline for several years, particularly as it failed to introduce new innovations or features at the same time that the iPhone was rising in popularity. The company’s cash balance plummeted $500 million to $2.6 billion last quarter, and the company is expected to pose a quarterly loss of nearly $1 billion during the fourth quarter of this year. In addition, the smartphone maker said it planned to lay off roughly 40 percent of its workforce, or 4,500 people.
The company’s weakened financial position has caused its credit profile to mirror that of a junk-rated company, Bloomberg notes. Marc Gross, a financial manager at RS Investments, told the news source that investors are only likely to purchase debt if it’s backed by Blackberry’s patents – currently its most lucrative assets – and even this scenario may depend on how much they could recover should the company seek bankruptcy protection.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!