Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Seeks $100 Million from Former HP Chairman Ray Lane
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 24, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Ray Lane, former chairman of Hewlett-Packard Co., and the Internal Revenue Service remain at odds over a reported $100 million tax bill which Lane plans to dispute.
The businessman said he will appeal a ruling by the U.S. Tax Court which claims he owes roughly $100 million in taxes as a result of his participation in what the IRS calls an illegal tax shelter. The case stems back to the dot-com era when certain corporate tax shelters reined supreme. However, many of these havens are no longer recognized under U.S. tax law, and Lane may now face the ramifications of using a POPS shelter to generate “improperly” claimed losses of $251 million to offset income.
Lane argued that the IRS was wrong to say his partnership, Vanadium Partners Fund LLC, lacked “legitimate business purpose.” He explained that the partnership invested in several start-up companies that later went under, which allowed the group to legitimately claim losses. He also said that he has always been fully willing to cooperate with the IRS to reach a settlement, but that this process has been held up as a result of disagreements with remaining partners.
“It’s from the year 2000. It was never a dispute by me; it was disputed by the partnership,” Lane said in an interview with MarketWatch. “Part of that partnership has been disputing this for a long time.”
Since 2000, the partnership invested in five companies, and also purchased stock options and warrants. However, the IRS argues that the investments in the companies “were payments of fees to promoters of listed and/or abusive tax avoidance transactions,” according to Bloomberg. The agency noted that because Lane and other investors failed to establish the value of stock options or warrants in an “amount greater than zero,” the losses were not allowable under U.S. tax law, the news source added.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
IRS Seeks $100 Million from Former HP Chairman Ray Lane
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Ray Lane, former chairman of Hewlett-Packard Co., and the Internal Revenue Service remain at odds over a reported $100 million tax bill which Lane plans to dispute.
The businessman said he will appeal a ruling by the U.S. Tax Court which claims he owes roughly $100 million in taxes as a result of his participation in what the IRS calls an illegal tax shelter. The case stems back to the dot-com era when certain corporate tax shelters reined supreme. However, many of these havens are no longer recognized under U.S. tax law, and Lane may now face the ramifications of using a POPS shelter to generate “improperly” claimed losses of $251 million to offset income.
Lane argued that the IRS was wrong to say his partnership, Vanadium Partners Fund LLC, lacked “legitimate business purpose.” He explained that the partnership invested in several start-up companies that later went under, which allowed the group to legitimately claim losses. He also said that he has always been fully willing to cooperate with the IRS to reach a settlement, but that this process has been held up as a result of disagreements with remaining partners.
“It’s from the year 2000. It was never a dispute by me; it was disputed by the partnership,” Lane said in an interview with MarketWatch. “Part of that partnership has been disputing this for a long time.”
Since 2000, the partnership invested in five companies, and also purchased stock options and warrants. However, the IRS argues that the investments in the companies “were payments of fees to promoters of listed and/or abusive tax avoidance transactions,” according to Bloomberg. The agency noted that because Lane and other investors failed to establish the value of stock options or warrants in an “amount greater than zero,” the losses were not allowable under U.S. tax law, the news source added.