Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Relies on Rule from 1800s to Justify Tax Preparer Regulations
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 9, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Internal Revenue Service is pulling out all the stops to support a set of proposed rules that would allow it to better regulate tax preparers, as evidenced by its use of a long-forgotten law from the 1800s to justify its argument.
At an appellate court hearing challenging the IRS tax law, Justice Department representative Gilbert Rothenberg cited the “Horse Act of 1884” as a governing piece of legislation that authorizes the IRS to regulate thousands of independent tax preparers, according to Reuters. Rothenberg explained that in the years following the Civil War, many Americans submitted war loss claims to the government for lost or missing horses. This led to the emergence of unregulated agents who would represent and lobby for these individuals for a fee. Over time, many agents began inflating both claim values and fees, which led to the government passing legislation to regulate intermediaries, Rothenberg concluded.
He explained that this scenario largely mirrors what could occur in present time if tax preparers are permitted to work without government oversight or be required to to pass a competency test and take annual continuing education classes. However, the Institute for Justice, which opposes the IRS law, argued that “representatives” and “service providers” do not fall under the same classification, and that tax preparers merely provide a paid service to clients.
“Preparing a tax return is not a representative act,” said Dan Alban, a representative for the institute, according to Reuters. “It is performing a service, certainly, but there’s no representation.”
The three appellate judges hearing the case seemed to agree, and peppered Rothenberg with questions about the scope and history of this law, according to Politico. However, the court is not expected to reach a ruling for some time, as arguments over whether independent tax preparers should face stricter regulations will continue for the next several months.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
IRS Relies on Rule from 1800s to Justify Tax Preparer Regulations
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Internal Revenue Service is pulling out all the stops to support a set of proposed rules that would allow it to better regulate tax preparers, as evidenced by its use of a long-forgotten law from the 1800s to justify its argument.
At an appellate court hearing challenging the IRS tax law, Justice Department representative Gilbert Rothenberg cited the “Horse Act of 1884” as a governing piece of legislation that authorizes the IRS to regulate thousands of independent tax preparers, according to Reuters. Rothenberg explained that in the years following the Civil War, many Americans submitted war loss claims to the government for lost or missing horses. This led to the emergence of unregulated agents who would represent and lobby for these individuals for a fee. Over time, many agents began inflating both claim values and fees, which led to the government passing legislation to regulate intermediaries, Rothenberg concluded.
He explained that this scenario largely mirrors what could occur in present time if tax preparers are permitted to work without government oversight or be required to to pass a competency test and take annual continuing education classes. However, the Institute for Justice, which opposes the IRS law, argued that “representatives” and “service providers” do not fall under the same classification, and that tax preparers merely provide a paid service to clients.
“Preparing a tax return is not a representative act,” said Dan Alban, a representative for the institute, according to Reuters. “It is performing a service, certainly, but there’s no representation.”
The three appellate judges hearing the case seemed to agree, and peppered Rothenberg with questions about the scope and history of this law, according to Politico. However, the court is not expected to reach a ruling for some time, as arguments over whether independent tax preparers should face stricter regulations will continue for the next several months.