Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 3, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAfter several stops and starts, the agency announced it has unveiled a new online registration for American and foreign financial institutions that need to comply with the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act.

The move represents one of the last steps the tax agency needed to take to get its FATCA implementation off the ground by July 2014. Although financial institutions are not required to comply with FATCA and distribute information about account holders who may be evading federal tax law, they may face significant reputational damage and find it more challenging to compete in an international economy.
Under existing rules, U.S. taxpayers with more than $50,000 in foreign accounts must report information on those accounts. Individuals who fail to file these reports face penalties of up to $50,000, in addition to other penalties for underpayment. The rules also enable U.S. banks that are receiving funds transfers from overseas to withhold 30 percent of the cash for Americans who fail to comply with the regulations. The penalty could essentially freeze foreign institutions that disregard the rules out of U.S. financial markets.
“FATCA is an actual reality now for most banks who assumed that FATCA deadlines would continue to be pushed,” Reetu Khosla, a global director at risk, fraud, and compliance at software provider Pegasystems, told American Banker. “More and more banks will need to ramp up to meet next year’s deadlines to implement their rules, processes and technology to meet FATCA requirements.”
The IRS will begin approving firms’ registrations in 2014, as banks and institutions must register by April 25, 2014, to avoid FATCA’s withholding penalties. In June 2014, the agency will publish a list of all the firms complying with FATCA, according to Reuters.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!