Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
IRS Defends $2 Billion Tax Dispute with Bill Davidson's Estate
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 9, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Internal Revenue Service is not backing down on a tax dispute claiming that the estate of the late Piston’s owner Bill Davidson owes more than $2 billion in estate taxes. The agency said the large estate bill is the result of Davidson’s misuse of gift tax law and his underpayment for sizable gifts made to family members. The agency is also disputing the value of stocks put in trusts for his heirs.
Davidson’s estate representatives contend that they do not owe the IRS anything more than what they have already paid in estate taxes, and the dispute is likely to play out in court as both parties are unwilling to concede. The estate asserts that the federal tax agency has greatly inflated the tax bill – which is approximately $2.8 billion, according to the Detroit Free Press. However, the agency fired back in a U.S. Tax Court in Washington, and said that Davidson failed to report on large gifts and did not properly value certain investments passed on to beneficiaries.
For instance, the agency argues that Davidson failed to use the same standards and methods of establishing value of stocks that the IRS uses. In addition, it charges that Davidson’s life expectancy was a key determination in establishing the value of self-canceling installment notes, the newspaper reports. With these notes, Davidson could essentially transfer assets to family members, who would make payments on the assets while Davidson lived. After his death, the family members would own the assets outright.
Although physicians gave Davidson a clean bill of health in the months before his death and presumed that he had several years left in his life expectancy, the agency – which uses life expectancy to determine whether payments are taxed or considered gifts – claims that these amounts are taxable.
- Practices: Tax, Trusts & Estates
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
IRS Defends $2 Billion Tax Dispute with Bill Davidson's Estate
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Internal Revenue Service is not backing down on a tax dispute claiming that the estate of the late Piston’s owner Bill Davidson owes more than $2 billion in estate taxes. The agency said the large estate bill is the result of Davidson’s misuse of gift tax law and his underpayment for sizable gifts made to family members. The agency is also disputing the value of stocks put in trusts for his heirs.
Davidson’s estate representatives contend that they do not owe the IRS anything more than what they have already paid in estate taxes, and the dispute is likely to play out in court as both parties are unwilling to concede. The estate asserts that the federal tax agency has greatly inflated the tax bill – which is approximately $2.8 billion, according to the Detroit Free Press. However, the agency fired back in a U.S. Tax Court in Washington, and said that Davidson failed to report on large gifts and did not properly value certain investments passed on to beneficiaries.
For instance, the agency argues that Davidson failed to use the same standards and methods of establishing value of stocks that the IRS uses. In addition, it charges that Davidson’s life expectancy was a key determination in establishing the value of self-canceling installment notes, the newspaper reports. With these notes, Davidson could essentially transfer assets to family members, who would make payments on the assets while Davidson lived. After his death, the family members would own the assets outright.
Although physicians gave Davidson a clean bill of health in the months before his death and presumed that he had several years left in his life expectancy, the agency – which uses life expectancy to determine whether payments are taxed or considered gifts – claims that these amounts are taxable.