Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comEsports, short for electronic sports, are competitive video games that are typically broadcasted online and sometimes on television, i.g., TBS’ ELEAGUE. Esports is a booming market, according to a report by market researcher Newzoo. By 2019, the sports industry is expected to generate nearly 1.1 billion dollars worldwide. As this industry continues to grow, there will be more opportunities for leagues, teams and players to exploit the underlying intellectual property. As such, it is important for all parties involved to fully understand what rights they may have in such intellectual property.

Let’s take a closer look at how eSports and intellectual property connect, as well as a few challenges regarding IP protection in eSports that lie ahead.
In traditional sports, like in many businesses and industries today, intellectual property can be used to generate significant revenue. These assets, which in this context will generally consist of trademarks and/or copyrights, can be quite valuable to their owners. All parties involved in eSports should have an understanding of what they own or control in terms of intellectual property so they are aware of how to best exploit such property.
eSports pose unique issues in intellectual property as it is typically the game developers and publishers that own the underlying intellectual property, not the teams or players. For example, the avatars (created characters) being used by the players are owned by the aforementioned commercial entities, not the player who created them. This means that teams and players alike must develop intellectual property separate and apart from the game itself for commercial exploitation. The typical example of this is a stylized logo.
Like traditional sports, gambling plays a big role in Esports. This has encouraged a desire to obtain intellectual property protection for the competition itself. U.S. Patent No. 8,882,576, which is called “Determining game skill factor” protects an algorithm that determines the outcome of variances between skill and chance. Another patent, U.S. Patent No. 9,349,246, also known as “Integrations portal for a peer-to-peer game platform” gives game developers the opportunity to allow peer-to-peer wagering as well as a tournament management platform through self-service.
Obtaining IP rights for eSports is possible, but that doesn’t mean it’s always easy. As stated by IP Watch Dog, “Enforcement of the patents described above could be thwarted by a subject matter eligibility challenge at the district court, and the court could find that the patent claims are ineligible subject matter.”
The patented technologies could be instead disputed as “abstract ideas” not directly tying them to a specific computer. Could these claims survive a challenge? According to Isaac Rabicoff and Kenneth Matuszewski, “[i]t is uncertain whether the claims could survive a challenge under a subject matter eligibility challenge during district court litigation because the success of the subject matter eligibility challenge is highly dependent on the type of patented technology being challenged.”
Additionally, the eSports market run will into issues with regard to copyright law since, as stated above, the teams and players do not own the video games and its underlying content. Accordingly, it is critical that teams and players sit down with developers to discuss how they can commercially exploit the intellectual property.
If you’re interested in becoming an eSports player and would like to learn more about intellectual property, reach out to one of the attorneys at Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our experienced professionals can further explain IP protection as well as information on contractual agreements, legal counseling, protection and more. Otherwise, for more general eSports questions and concerns, don’t hesitate to contact us at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!