Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Counterfeit Goods Pose Growing IP Enforcement Challenge

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: October 31, 2017

Key Contacts

Back

Counterfeit Goods Pose Growing IP Enforcement Challenge 

Counterfeit goods are most likely to come from China and India, according to a new report by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation (OECD) and Development and the European Union Intellectual Property Office. The report also highlights the role of e-commerce in fostering piracy and counterfeiting, as well as increasing the challenge of protecting intellectual property rights.

Counterfeit Goods Pose Growing Intellectual Property Enforcement Challenge
Photo courtesy of Erwan Hesry (Unsplash.com)

OECD Report on Counterfeiting

The report, entitled “Mapping the Real Routes of Trade in Fake Goods,” estimates that the total import value of counterfeit and pirated goods in 2013 was $461 billion. “Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods is a vital threat to modern, innovation-driven economies, a worldwide phenomenon that grows in scope and magnitude,” the OECD said in a press statement. “Counterfeiters ship infringing products via complex routes, with many intermediary points, which poses a substantial challenge to efficient enforcement.” 

According to the OECD report, China and Hong Kong were identified as the place of origin of 80 percent of the fakes seized by authorities. They are also the top producers in 9 out of the 10 top counterfeit categories: electronics, jewelry, optical/photographic/medical equipment, clothing and textiles, pharmaceuticals, footwear, foodstuff, toys and games, leather and handbags, and perfume.

The report also examined the complex routes of trade in counterfeit pirated goods. It found that 63 percent of seized counterfeit goods were transported via postal and express delivery services. As noted by the OECD, this poses a significant challenge for law enforcement.

Role of Customs and Border Protection in Protecting IP

Many small businesses are unaware that U.S. Customs and Border Protection plays a vital role in enforcing intellectual property rights. In addition, registering your trademarks and copyrights is one of the most cost-effective ways to protect your brand from counterfeiting.

In policing U.S. borders, CBP is authorized to exclude, detain and/or seize imported merchandise that infringes federally registered and recorded trademarks and copyrights and/or is covered by an exclusion order issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission. It is also the legal authority to make substantive determinations regarding infringement of trademarks and copyrights, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, the Lanham Act of 1946, the Copyright Act of 1976, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998.

Earlier this year, the CBP announced that it seized a record number of shipments containing goods that violated Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in FY2016. Seizures of counterfeit and pirated goods rose nine percent in FY2016. The CBP reported that the total estimated manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of the 31,560 seized goods, had they been genuine, was more than $1.38 billion. 

To help prevent imports or exports of infringing goods, businesses should record their trademarks and copyrights with CBP. The process is fairly straightforward and may be done online via the Intellectual Property Rights e-Recordation (IPRR) application. The recordation fee for copyrights is $190. The recordation fee for trademarks is $190 per International Class of goods. The benefit of recordation is that information, including photographs of your genuine products, is readily available to CBP personnel at the borders.

The CBP also encourages IP owners to submit allegations of infringing shipments or conduct to CBP via its e-Allegations website. The agency then uses the information, which can be submitted anonymously, to target counterfeiting activities and may refer cases for criminal investigations.

Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Adrian Lee, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"
Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make post image

Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make"
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits post image

What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits"
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies post image

Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]

Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Link to post with title - "Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies"
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights post image

What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]

Author: Robert E. Levy

Link to post with title - "What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights"
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities post image

Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!