Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 16, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
Most recently, two New York men were charged with stealing source code from Flow Traders L.L.C., a high-frequency trading firm in Manhattan. They planned to use the information to establish a competing business, according to criminal complaints filed by the office of Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance.
The court documents allege that former trader Jason Vuu sent trading strategies, valuation algorithms and proprietary code from his work email account to his personal email address. He subsequently shared the information with Simon Lu using file-hosting service Dropbox.
The latest charges follow the high-profile prosecution of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. programmer Sergey Aleynikov, who was also charged with misappropriating proprietary source code. As previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, federal charges were ultimately dismissed after the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that downloading proprietary computer code does not constitute stealing under the National Stolen Property Act, which criminalizes the theft of trade secrets. The state charges are still pending trial.
While there are criminal and civil remedies available in the case of source code misappropriation, the best defense is a strong offense. Given how easily technology can be used to facilitate trade secret theft, New York and New Jersey businesses brokerage firms should have strong intellectual property policies and procedures in place. These include non-disclosure agreements, non-compete agreements, and security protocols.
If you have any questions about the current trade secret theft case or would like to discuss how to better protect your firm, please contact me, Jay Surgent, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!