Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 23, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe President signed the order at the White House Summit on Cybersecurity and Consumer Protection in Palo Alto, California. “There’s only one way to defend America from these cyber threats and that is through government and industry working together, sharing appropriate information as true partners,” he remarked.
To quickly identify and protect against cyber threats, the Executive Order lays out a framework for expanded information sharing via information sharing and analysis organizations (ISAOs). As the President described when first announcing his cybersecurity initiatives, the new entities will serve as focal points for cybersecurity information sharing and collaboration within the private sector and between the private sector and government.
Under the plan, ISAOs will alert businesses about potential threats while also collecting information from the private sector about cyberattacks or data intrusions. The new organizations can be private or public organizations, or consist of a combination of the two. They may also be formed as for-profit or nonprofit entities.
The Department of Homeland Security’s National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC) will coordinate with ISAOs on the sharing of information related to cybersecurity risks and incidents. The Executive Order also directs the agency to fund the creation of a non-profit organization to develop a common set of voluntary standards for ISAOs.
While some criticize the Executive Order because it does not address providing businesses with a safe harbor when providing information about cyber risks, the White House maintains that it will “pave[] the way for new legislation, by building out the concept of ISAOs as a framework for the targeted liability protections that the Administration has long asserted are pivotal to incentivizing and expanding information sharing.”
Despite the absence of liability protection at this time, several large corporations, including Apple, Intel, and Pacific Gas and Electric Co., have already committed to the plan. As American Express Co. CEO Kenneth Chenault stated during the White House Summit, “[i]nformation sharing may be the single highest-impact, lowest-cost and fastest way to implement capabilities we have in hand as a nation to accelerate our overall defense.”
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments regarding Obama’s Executive Order or his cybersecurity agenda in general? Feel free to leave a comment below and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo, @eWHW_Blog, @S_H_Law. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your data security efforts, please contact me, Fernando M. Pinguelo or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!