Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 8, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn the wake of Judge Richard Berman’s ruling on the now infamous Deflategate scandal, it is important to understand that in the NFL double jeopardy – as the concept is called – is virtually nonexistent.
The legal concept of double jeopardy goes as follows: “No person shall … be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” This clause is contained in the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Many states also offer a similar guarantee. The concept applies to certain types of criminal cases – all felonies, misdemeanors and juvenile delinquency adjudications, for example. The NFL, however, has rules of its own, and though Deflategate has stretched on for nearly eight months, if you pinpoint the beginning of New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady’s battle against the NFL as the Jan.18 AFC Championship game against the Indianapolis Colts, the sure-shot Hall of Famer has only been punished once by the league.
For those uninitiated into this saga of footballs and the gaseous regulations the NFL applies to them, after the aforementioned game the league discovered that some of the Patriots’ footballs may have been underinflated according to the league’s rules regarding air pressure. Following the slow and varied release of information on what exactly happened that night, it was announced that NFL general counsel Jeff Pash, and attorney Ted Wells, would launch an investigation into who, exactly, deflated the footballs and whether Brady, Patriots’ coach Bill Belichick or executives within the Patriots organization knew about the deflation of the game balls.
Wells found that Brady was at least somewhat aware of what was going on and the quarterback was handed a four-game suspension, which he, along with the the NFL Players Association, appealed. After a lengthy litigation process presided over by Berman, Brady’s suspension was lifted on Sept. 3. Following yet another blow to Commissioner Roger Goodell’s authority, it has been generally assumed that the Patriots will take the field this season with vengeance on their mind, and all will be well – maybe with the exception of an NFL appeal.
However, something NFL players should know is that in the league a player can be punished twice for the same offense. Whether that second punishment will hold up is a different story, but, nonetheless, there’s nothing stopping Goodell from handing down yet another punishment to Brady, according to Sports Illustrated, except maybe another public relations hit and continued, costly litigation.
Berman’s ruling applies only to Goodell’s decision to uphold Brady’s four-game suspension, SI explained. While that punishment has now been lifted, that doesn’t mean another doesn’t lie in wait for the quarterback. This is similar to how the commissioner twice suspended Ray Rice, first after initial domestic violence allegations came to light, then again, following the release of a video which clearly showed the extent of the harm the former Baltimore Ravens running back caused his then-fiancee. Though the second suspension was later overturned by a judge, that ruling was not handed down because the commissioner cannot punish a player twice in reaction to the same offense. It was voided because the second suspension handed down to Rice was done so in an “arbitrary manner.”
The fact remains, Goodell can punish a player twice the for the same offense.
Article 46, Section 4 of the collective bargaining agreement between the NFL and the NFLPA states that the league and any given organization, like a player’s team, cannot discipline a player for the same act. However, it does not state that the NFL cannot punish a player multiple times for the same offense. The league has not lost its right to punish a player under the agreement, simply because a judge voided previous disciplinary act through his ruling, SI explained. Since Brady was not criminally prosecuted, but simply punished under the collective bargaining agreement – however dubiously and arbitrarily the process may or may not have been – double jeopardy does not apply here.
The NFL has its own set of laws, and under them, Brady is not free from punishment yet. However, it must be considered that, after the Shield was so thoroughly dented in today’s ruling, is another punishment really something Goodell is willing to try?
If you find yourself questioning any punishment handed down by the league, seek out the help of an attorney with an extensive knowledge of sports law to help you determine your next step.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!