
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 7, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comWhen Hostess Brands Inc. filed for protection under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in 2012, it posed risk to other pensions and medical charges for its employees as one of the the driving reasons behind the filing. At the time, the company was involved in a struggle with workers’ unions over a new contract that would have cut wages and benefits. The union rejected the offer, and reported that the company stopped paying workers’ pensions in 2011.
Hostess’s bankruptcy filing caused significant concern among workers at another company, Ottenberg’s Bakery, a family owned company in Maryland, with which it shared a pension plan, according to Bloomberg Business. Under a multiemployer pension plan, pensions are paid into large investment pools shared among multiple employers. These plans are considered to be a lower risk than single employer plans, because even if one company fails, the pensions are guaranteed by other employers paying into the same pool.
About 10.4 million Americans’ retirement plans are tied to multiemployer pension plans, according to the news source, but after recent economic distress and deregulation, the funds face a combined shortfall of approximately $400 billion. As a result, many are near insolvency.
After the Hostess bankruptcy, Ottenberg’s Bakery was going to be stuck footing the bill for both companies’ employees – an untenable position. In an effort to rectify the situation, the U.S. government saved the benefits of Ottenberg’s employees last week by sacrificing the pensions of Hostess’ drivers, who will now get a reduced payout that the government will finance, reports Bloomberg.
In the 40 years that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. has existed, this is only the third time that it has carved up a fund, according to the news source.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!