Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Hostess Brands Inc. bankruptcy posed risk to other pensions
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
When Hostess Brands Inc. filed for protection under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in 2012, it posed risk to other pensions and medical charges for its employees as one of the the driving reasons behind the filing. At the time, the company was involved in a struggle with workers’ unions over a new contract that would have cut wages and benefits. The union rejected the offer, and reported that the company stopped paying workers’ pensions in 2011.
Hostess’s bankruptcy filing caused significant concern among workers at another company, Ottenberg’s Bakery, a family owned company in Maryland, with which it shared a pension plan, according to Bloomberg Business. Under a multiemployer pension plan, pensions are paid into large investment pools shared among multiple employers. These plans are considered to be a lower risk than single employer plans, because even if one company fails, the pensions are guaranteed by other employers paying into the same pool.
About 10.4 million Americans’ retirement plans are tied to multiemployer pension plans, according to the news source, but after recent economic distress and deregulation, the funds face a combined shortfall of approximately $400 billion. As a result, many are near insolvency.
After the Hostess bankruptcy, Ottenberg’s Bakery was going to be stuck footing the bill for both companies’ employees – an untenable position. In an effort to rectify the situation, the U.S. government saved the benefits of Ottenberg’s employees last week by sacrificing the pensions of Hostess’ drivers, who will now get a reduced payout that the government will finance, reports Bloomberg.
In the 40 years that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. has existed, this is only the third time that it has carved up a fund, according to the news source.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.