Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Hostess Brands Inc. bankruptcy posed risk to other pensions
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
When Hostess Brands Inc. filed for protection under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law in 2012, it posed risk to other pensions and medical charges for its employees as one of the the driving reasons behind the filing. At the time, the company was involved in a struggle with workers’ unions over a new contract that would have cut wages and benefits. The union rejected the offer, and reported that the company stopped paying workers’ pensions in 2011.
Hostess’s bankruptcy filing caused significant concern among workers at another company, Ottenberg’s Bakery, a family owned company in Maryland, with which it shared a pension plan, according to Bloomberg Business. Under a multiemployer pension plan, pensions are paid into large investment pools shared among multiple employers. These plans are considered to be a lower risk than single employer plans, because even if one company fails, the pensions are guaranteed by other employers paying into the same pool.
About 10.4 million Americans’ retirement plans are tied to multiemployer pension plans, according to the news source, but after recent economic distress and deregulation, the funds face a combined shortfall of approximately $400 billion. As a result, many are near insolvency.
After the Hostess bankruptcy, Ottenberg’s Bakery was going to be stuck footing the bill for both companies’ employees – an untenable position. In an effort to rectify the situation, the U.S. government saved the benefits of Ottenberg’s employees last week by sacrificing the pensions of Hostess’ drivers, who will now get a reduced payout that the government will finance, reports Bloomberg.
In the 40 years that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. has existed, this is only the third time that it has carved up a fund, according to the news source.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.