Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
The Evolution of Health Care Competition Laws
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 3, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
The Federal Trade Commission, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, recently held a two-day workshop to analyze the competitive effects of developing health care provider organizations and payment models on the provision of health care services in the United States.
Prior to the 1970s, regulators did not enforce anti-competition laws against professional service providers. However, in Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not intend any sweeping “learned profession” exclusion from the Sherman Act. Accordingly, a minimum fee schedule for title examinations, as published by the Fairfax County Bar Association, violated the anti-trust statute.
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, the FTC began to examine restrictions on competition adopted by professional associations. In December 1975, the FTC filed an administrative complaint against the American Medical Association, alleging that the association’s “Principles of Medical Ethics” unreasonably restrained trade by prohibiting advertising and solicitation.
According to the FTC, “Ethical principles of the medical profession have prevented doctors and medical organizations from disseminating information on the prices and services they offer, severely inhibiting competition among health care providers.” The Second Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the FTC, and the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the decision.
According to the FTC, the precedent set forth in the AMA case has influenced more than 100 FTC cases. The FTC’s growing health care initiatives also ultimately led to the creation of the Bureau of Competition’s Health Care Division. In recent years, the FTC has focused its efforts on promoting competition in health care markets, preventing false and deceptive health claims, and improving transparency with respect to health care products and services.
Today, the FTC is again reviewing its health care initiatives in light of the rapidly evolving health care industry, including changes under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In the Federal Register Notice published in conjunction with the workshop, the FCC identified the following issues of concern: early observations regarding accountable care organizations; alternatives to traditional fee-for-service payment models; trends in provider consolidation; trends in provider network and benefit design strategies, as well as contracting practices and regulatory activity that may enhance or undermine these strategies; and early observations regarding health insurance exchanges.
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo, @eWHW_Blog, @S_H_Law. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your data security efforts, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn how Scarinci Hollenbeck can be of assistance, please visit Scarinci Hollenbeck Cyber Security and Data Protection Law Practice.
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Evolution of Health Care Competition Laws
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Federal Trade Commission, in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, recently held a two-day workshop to analyze the competitive effects of developing health care provider organizations and payment models on the provision of health care services in the United States.
Prior to the 1970s, regulators did not enforce anti-competition laws against professional service providers. However, in Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not intend any sweeping “learned profession” exclusion from the Sherman Act. Accordingly, a minimum fee schedule for title examinations, as published by the Fairfax County Bar Association, violated the anti-trust statute.
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, the FTC began to examine restrictions on competition adopted by professional associations. In December 1975, the FTC filed an administrative complaint against the American Medical Association, alleging that the association’s “Principles of Medical Ethics” unreasonably restrained trade by prohibiting advertising and solicitation.
According to the FTC, “Ethical principles of the medical profession have prevented doctors and medical organizations from disseminating information on the prices and services they offer, severely inhibiting competition among health care providers.” The Second Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the FTC, and the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the decision.
According to the FTC, the precedent set forth in the AMA case has influenced more than 100 FTC cases. The FTC’s growing health care initiatives also ultimately led to the creation of the Bureau of Competition’s Health Care Division. In recent years, the FTC has focused its efforts on promoting competition in health care markets, preventing false and deceptive health claims, and improving transparency with respect to health care products and services.
Today, the FTC is again reviewing its health care initiatives in light of the rapidly evolving health care industry, including changes under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In the Federal Register Notice published in conjunction with the workshop, the FCC identified the following issues of concern: early observations regarding accountable care organizations; alternatives to traditional fee-for-service payment models; trends in provider consolidation; trends in provider network and benefit design strategies, as well as contracting practices and regulatory activity that may enhance or undermine these strategies; and early observations regarding health insurance exchanges.
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo, @eWHW_Blog, @S_H_Law. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your data security efforts, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn how Scarinci Hollenbeck can be of assistance, please visit Scarinci Hollenbeck Cyber Security and Data Protection Law Practice.