
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 23, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comA government lawsuit, filed by the Justice Department and several states, is seeking to halt the proposed American Airlines merger with US Airways. The merger – the final step in AMR’s exit from bankruptcy protection – would create the largest airline in the world.
The government’s antitrust suit was largely unexpected, as the two airlines have been making notable and unimpeded progress toward their merger in recent weeks. However, the suit will halt those plans, as the Justice Department seeks to prove that the merger will hinder competition and hurt consumers by leading to higher fares and fees. Should the merger be pushed through, the government said, it feared the new airline would control more than 80 percent of the U.S. commercial air market.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, and Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia joined in the litigation. In a conference call to reporters, Bill Baer of the Justice Department said that the suit is critical to protecting consumers from hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary and burdensome costs.
“While shareholders might benefit, [and] creditors might benefit from consolidation, the fact of the matter is, consumers will get the shaft,” said Baer. “The right option here is a full-stop injunction.”
US Airways CEO Doug Parker disagreed with the Justice Department’s assertions, especially as the merger has already been approved by the European Union, airline creditors, and airline shareholders.
“We are extremely disappointed in this action and believe the DOJ is wrong in its assessment,” said Parker. “We will fight them.”
A hearing to confirm AMR’s bankruptcy exit plan is expected to move forward on Thursday, and it is unclear how the lawsuit may initially impact the company’s plan to emerge from proceedings.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!