Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Former Head of USPTO Offers Insight on “Software Patent Wars”
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: June 12, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
As patent infringement battles rage between technology giants like Apple, Google, Oracle and Samsung, the debate continues about the impact of the litigation on innovation. Many also question whether the suits reflect weaknesses in the U.S. patent system.
David Kappos, the former Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), recently addressed the so-called “patent wars” impacting the software industry in an article published in the Stanford Technology Law Review. His perspective is interesting, given that he left his post at the USPTO only a few months ago.
In essence, Kappos argues that the smart phone patent wars are not about low quality software patents or an ineffective patent system. As he explains in the article, “The real issue is the historical tension between the necessary long-term incentives that form the basis for the patent system, versus the desire of consumers to have products and services today at the lowest prices possible.”
Kappos first dispels the notion that the USPTO’s process for evaluating software patents is broken. He points to a USPTO study that found that in over 80 percent of the smartphone lawsuits, the courts have construed the software patents at issue as valid, which he notes is “a far cry from the dire declarations.”
Kappos also argues that software patent applications are getting the same rigorous review by examiners as other technologies. He cites that allowances for software applications were correctly issued 96.8% of the time and for non-software applications 96.5% of the time. Similarly, final rejections for software applications were correctly issued 93.6% of the time and for non-software applications 93.5% of the time.
Finally, Kappos highlights that many problems with the patent system have already been fixed under the America Invents Act. He specifically mentions the new options available to challenge the validity of software patents, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and business method patents review.
“The USPTO itself, in partnership with its user community, has already implemented a series of steps to improve patent quality and is diligently working on the remaining challenges facing software patenting,” he writes.
If you have any questions about this article or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Former Head of USPTO Offers Insight on “Software Patent Wars”
Author: Fred D. Zemel
As patent infringement battles rage between technology giants like Apple, Google, Oracle and Samsung, the debate continues about the impact of the litigation on innovation. Many also question whether the suits reflect weaknesses in the U.S. patent system.
David Kappos, the former Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), recently addressed the so-called “patent wars” impacting the software industry in an article published in the Stanford Technology Law Review. His perspective is interesting, given that he left his post at the USPTO only a few months ago.
In essence, Kappos argues that the smart phone patent wars are not about low quality software patents or an ineffective patent system. As he explains in the article, “The real issue is the historical tension between the necessary long-term incentives that form the basis for the patent system, versus the desire of consumers to have products and services today at the lowest prices possible.”
Kappos first dispels the notion that the USPTO’s process for evaluating software patents is broken. He points to a USPTO study that found that in over 80 percent of the smartphone lawsuits, the courts have construed the software patents at issue as valid, which he notes is “a far cry from the dire declarations.”
Kappos also argues that software patent applications are getting the same rigorous review by examiners as other technologies. He cites that allowances for software applications were correctly issued 96.8% of the time and for non-software applications 96.5% of the time. Similarly, final rejections for software applications were correctly issued 93.6% of the time and for non-software applications 93.5% of the time.
Finally, Kappos highlights that many problems with the patent system have already been fixed under the America Invents Act. He specifically mentions the new options available to challenge the validity of software patents, including post-grant review, inter partes review, and business method patents review.
“The USPTO itself, in partnership with its user community, has already implemented a series of steps to improve patent quality and is diligently working on the remaining challenges facing software patenting,” he writes.
If you have any questions about this article or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.