
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: September 16, 2014
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThis one in particular, which depicts Sanders holding an orange microphone, has garnered attention. The text reads, “Want to better understand why we have a federal deficit? In 1952, the corporate income tax accounted for 33 percent of all federal tax revenue. Today, despite record breaking profits, corporate taxes bring in less than 9 percent. It’s time for real tax reform.”
In terms of political efficacy, the meme is right on point. A growing sentiment in America says that the rich should be made to bear a higher tax burden in response to the massive wealth inequality experienced in the post-recession country. Concerns about corporate tax evasion, especially the hot-button issue of corporate inversions, could not be higher.
In short, the statement is sensational. This sensationalism led PolitiFact.com to verify the statement, resulting in a “mostly true” verdict. The Senator’s figures were almost exactly on the money, but two important factors cast doubt on the truth behind the statement’s meaning.
1. PolitiFact.com determined that the year was cherry-picked. In fact, 1952 was the third-highest year in history for corporate tax as a share of GDP, coming at a time when the U.S. was at the top of its game from an industrial perspective. That said, later figures show a smaller, but still significant decline in corporate taxation as a share of GDP.
2. The rise of “pass-through” organizations changed the shape of the corporate taxation landscape. Because of changes in tax rates and rules, many businesses now pass all profits onto shareholders or investors, meaning that no corporate income tax is collected. These shareholders must still pay taxes individually, further skewing the trend away from corporate income tax.
This week Senator Bernie Sanders made the news with this comments on tax reform. As tax attorneys both Frank L. Brunetti and I have written extensively the current state of tax reforms in the U.S. Check out the lastest posts and get the full scoop:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
This one in particular, which depicts Sanders holding an orange microphone, has garnered attention. The text reads, “Want to better understand why we have a federal deficit? In 1952, the corporate income tax accounted for 33 percent of all federal tax revenue. Today, despite record breaking profits, corporate taxes bring in less than 9 percent. It’s time for real tax reform.”
In terms of political efficacy, the meme is right on point. A growing sentiment in America says that the rich should be made to bear a higher tax burden in response to the massive wealth inequality experienced in the post-recession country. Concerns about corporate tax evasion, especially the hot-button issue of corporate inversions, could not be higher.
In short, the statement is sensational. This sensationalism led PolitiFact.com to verify the statement, resulting in a “mostly true” verdict. The Senator’s figures were almost exactly on the money, but two important factors cast doubt on the truth behind the statement’s meaning.
1. PolitiFact.com determined that the year was cherry-picked. In fact, 1952 was the third-highest year in history for corporate tax as a share of GDP, coming at a time when the U.S. was at the top of its game from an industrial perspective. That said, later figures show a smaller, but still significant decline in corporate taxation as a share of GDP.
2. The rise of “pass-through” organizations changed the shape of the corporate taxation landscape. Because of changes in tax rates and rules, many businesses now pass all profits onto shareholders or investors, meaning that no corporate income tax is collected. These shareholders must still pay taxes individually, further skewing the trend away from corporate income tax.
This week Senator Bernie Sanders made the news with this comments on tax reform. As tax attorneys both Frank L. Brunetti and I have written extensively the current state of tax reforms in the U.S. Check out the lastest posts and get the full scoop:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!