Charles H. Friedrich, III
Partner
201-896-7031 cfriedrich@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Executive Order Puts Mandatory Arbitration Provisions Back in the Spotlight
Author: Charles H. Friedrich, III
Date: August 21, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
President Barak Obama recently issued an executive order that restricts the use of mandatory arbitration provisions by federal contractors.
The move is likely to reignite the debate over the continued use of such provisions in a number of other arenas.
Under the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order, companies with federal contracts exceeding $1 million are, subject to certain exceptions, prohibited from requiring their employees to enter into predispute arbitration agreements for disputes arising out of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act or from torts related to sexual assault or harassment. These exceptions include agreements with employees covered by collective bargaining agreements negotiated between their contractor-employers and the labor organizations representing the employees. According to the Obama Administration, the order is intended to improve contractors’ compliance with labor laws and ensure that “employees get their day in court.”
The new restrictions take effect immediately for all new or renegotiated agreements covered by the executive order. Under other provisions of the order, prospective contractors will also be required to disclose labor law violations during the past three years before they can get a contract and, if a contract is awarded, to update these disclosures periodically thereafter. Companies with repeat violations may be denied contract awards and, in certain circumstances, may be declared ineligible for federal contracts.
While the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order may not impact many New Jersey businesses, it could spur momentum for further restrictions on the use of mandatory arbitration clauses. As previously discussed on this blog, lawmakers have been calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to ban what they call the “abuse of forced arbitration contracts” in brokerage agreements. Legislation is also pending to limit companies ability to mandate arbitration in consumer contracts and private employment agreements.
This latest executive order and any legislation passed by Congress will have to survive legal challenges. The country’s highest court has been decidedly pro-arbitration in recent years, most notably ruling that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted a California law prohibiting class-action waivers.
If you have questions about the executive order or would like to discuss how your business may be impacted, please contact me, Charles Friedrich, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Executive Order Puts Mandatory Arbitration Provisions Back in the Spotlight
Author: Charles H. Friedrich, III
President Barak Obama recently issued an executive order that restricts the use of mandatory arbitration provisions by federal contractors.
The move is likely to reignite the debate over the continued use of such provisions in a number of other arenas.
Under the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order, companies with federal contracts exceeding $1 million are, subject to certain exceptions, prohibited from requiring their employees to enter into predispute arbitration agreements for disputes arising out of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act or from torts related to sexual assault or harassment. These exceptions include agreements with employees covered by collective bargaining agreements negotiated between their contractor-employers and the labor organizations representing the employees. According to the Obama Administration, the order is intended to improve contractors’ compliance with labor laws and ensure that “employees get their day in court.”
The new restrictions take effect immediately for all new or renegotiated agreements covered by the executive order. Under other provisions of the order, prospective contractors will also be required to disclose labor law violations during the past three years before they can get a contract and, if a contract is awarded, to update these disclosures periodically thereafter. Companies with repeat violations may be denied contract awards and, in certain circumstances, may be declared ineligible for federal contracts.
While the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order may not impact many New Jersey businesses, it could spur momentum for further restrictions on the use of mandatory arbitration clauses. As previously discussed on this blog, lawmakers have been calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to exercise its authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to ban what they call the “abuse of forced arbitration contracts” in brokerage agreements. Legislation is also pending to limit companies ability to mandate arbitration in consumer contracts and private employment agreements.
This latest executive order and any legislation passed by Congress will have to survive legal challenges. The country’s highest court has been decidedly pro-arbitration in recent years, most notably ruling that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted a California law prohibiting class-action waivers.
If you have questions about the executive order or would like to discuss how your business may be impacted, please contact me, Charles Friedrich, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck Labor and Employment attorney with whom you work.