
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: April 8, 2014

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comEnergy Future Holdings Corp. is closing in on a deal that will allow it to speed up its planned bankruptcy restructuring, according to Bloomberg. Six years ago, the company was bought out in a historic $48 billion leveraged buyout, which left it with debt it couldn’t afford to pay. The company’s board of directors met recently after loan holders who walked away from October talks rejoined the discussion. The October discussions were intended to establish a blueprint for when the company files for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy law.
The company is lining up $9 billion in bankruptcy loans before its filing, sources involved told Reuters. The $9 billion debtor-In-possession loan is not yet signed, but is expected to be the largest privately funded bankruptcy filing ever to occur. The financing will include a $4 billion DIP loan for Texas Competitive Electric Holdings, the company’s unregulated merchant generation unit, and an almost $5 billion DIP loan for Energy Future Intermediate Holdings.
The October negotiations fell apart before Energy Future paid out $270 million in interest to junior bondholders – money that senior lenders had hoped would stay within the company, according to Bloomberg. The company’s private equity owners have been seeking a plan that would keep the company together. They acquired the company in 2007, using $40.1 billion of debt, in a bet that energy prices would increase. Instead, energy prices fell.
In the third quarter of 2013, Energy Future brought in $5 million, its first net income since 2010, according to the news source. Total assets were $38.7 billion as of Sept. 30, 2013, compared to $50.2 billion in total liabilities.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
Author: Paul Grossman

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!