Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Endeavour International Corp Attempts to Dismiss Bankruptcy Case

Author: Joel R. Glucksman

Date: October 27, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

On Sept. 14, Endeavour International Corp., an oil and gas exploration company, announced that it had submitted a bid to have its Chapter 11 bankruptcy case thrown out. According to Law 360, the move came as part of a “structured dismissal” under which Endeavour will transfer the bulk of its business assets to a group of senior bondholders in a debt-for-equity swap. The company’s unsecured creditors have criticized the new plan because they claim it is heavily slanted toward the top-ranking senior bondholders and overseas affiliates.

The original Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan

The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October 2014 citing more than $1.2 billion in debt in court documents, according to a Dow Jones Bankruptcy News report. At the time, Endeavour’s liquidity was shrinking and its balance sheet was over-leveraged, so it worked with its creditors to develop a reorganization plan. The pre-negotiated agreement called for Endeavour to quickly pass through the bankruptcy process as it would eliminate the company’s $568 million debt load and free up more than $50 million in fresh capital. However, due to the collapse of crude oil prices from $90 per barrel at the time of the deal to $45, Endeavour decided to pursue selling off its assets in an auction.

The newly proposed plan

The new plan would call for Endeavour to give all of its U.K. assets, which account for the majority of its business, to its senior bondholders. Endeavour would trade majority shares in the company to these top-ranking debt holders in exchange for wiping out its liabilities. This new agreement was reached between the parties outside of the courtroom.

The structured dismissal is a tactic for Endeavour to end its lengthy stay in bankruptcy. However, the new deal has come under scrutiny by the company’s unsecured creditors because it would enable Endeavour to get the benefit of Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to halt further lawsuits from creditors from a financing agreement reached prior to its bankruptcy filing. These creditors argue that the new deal would prevent them from recapturing any of their outstanding debts, which are claimed to be approximately $400 million, according to court documents. In turn, these unsecured creditors have filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case with the court against the company to appoint a trustee to oversee all of Endeavour’s remaining assets.

The newly proposed deal and the dismissal of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case are contingent upon approval from the court.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy in Endeavour’s future

The attorneys for the unsecured creditors stated that these companies do not want to dismiss the case, but to push Endeavour into Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection. This would force Endeavour to liquidate its assets with the proceeds going to the unsecured creditors. Further, a trustee would be appointed to manage Endeavour’s assets and distribute them to all of the creditors in accordance with Bankruptcy Code priorities.

However, Endeavour’s senior bondholders who are listed in the newly proposed deal objected to that request. Attorneys for the senior creditors argued that after the debt-for-equity exchange, there will no assets remaining for a court-appointed trustee to oversee.

Endeavour has buyers lined up

As part of the newly proposed deal, Endeavour will not only give up control of its U.K. assets, but it has secured buyers for its remaining U.S. assets as well. Its oil and natural gas assets in Colorado will be sold to Augustus Energy Partners LLC for $7.85 million and its shale reserves in both the Marcellus region of Pennsylvania and the Haynesville region of Louisiana for $1.8 million to Energy Reserves Group LLC. Both sales are predicated upon court approval.

Significance of the case

Endeavour’s case was significant because it was the first major oil and gas company to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. After a massive debt accumulation and amid rapidly declining prospects, its bankruptcy period was prolonged too far. Several other energy companies have faced similar circumstances: Since October 2014, at least 19 energy companies have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, including Quicksilver Resources, Sabine Oil & Gas and Hercules Offshore, Saratoga Resources, Dune Energy, American Eagle Energy, Cal Dive International and Boomerang Tube.

Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy?  Have you been sued by a bankrupt?  If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!