Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Eat More Kale Trademark Dispute Is A David vs. Goliath Situation
Author: Fred D. Zemel
Date: January 23, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
The battle over the Eat More Kale trademark appears to be over. After a much-publicized dispute with fast-food company Chick-fil-A, a Vermont small business owner can now take the final steps to perfect his federal trademark.
The trademark row started in early 2011 when folk artist Bo Muller-Moore filed for trademark protection for use of the phrase on hand-screened t-shirts, which are sold in Vermont and across the country via the Eat More Kate website. Chick-fil-A subsequently sent Muller-Moore a cease and desist letter, which demanded that Moore stop using the mark because it is too similar to the company’s trademarked “Eat Mor Chickn” slogan.
In response to the demand letter, which cited 30 other instances where companies agreed to stop using similar slogans, Moore took to social media, where he garnered nearly 15,000 Facebook fans. In addition, more than 42,000 supporters signed an online petition, which called for Chick-fil-A to “stop bullying small business owners.”
In an attempt to protect its trademark, Chick-fil-A also filed a letter of protest with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which preliminarily agreed that there was a likelihood of confusion between Muller-Moore’s mark and Chick-fil-A’s advertising slogan. According to the examiner, “The marks urge action in the same way, only as to different substances, and both of them are commonly consumed types of food.”
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the USPTO may refuse to grant trademark protection for marks that are likely to cause confusion with existing marks. Factors that are taken into consideration include: the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entirety as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression; similarity or dissimilarity of established, likely-to-continue trade channels; the fame of the prior mark; and the nature and extent of any actual or potential confusion.
Over a three-year period, Moore not only generated public support, but was also able to convince the USPO that a likelihood of confusion did not exist. In December, the USPTO issued a Notice of Allowance for the “Eat More Kale” mark, after no opposition was received when the mark was formally published.
Ultimately, Chick-fil-A decided to abandon its opposition to the trademark, likely for business rather than legal reasons. Its depiction of a corporate bully was far more damaging than the potential brand dilution. The fast-food company even attempted to interject humor into the situation by releasing a statement that “cows love kale too!”
As the case regarding the Eat More Kale dispute highlights, trademarks are valuable to businesses of all sizes. For more information about prosecuting a trademark application or defending your registered mark, please contact one of our experienced intellectual property lawyers.
- Business attorney New Jersey
- Business attorney NYC
- New Jersey Business Litigation Attorney
- Scarinci Hollenbeck
- Practices: Trademarks
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Eat More Kale Trademark Dispute Is A David vs. Goliath Situation
Author: Fred D. Zemel
The battle over the Eat More Kale trademark appears to be over. After a much-publicized dispute with fast-food company Chick-fil-A, a Vermont small business owner can now take the final steps to perfect his federal trademark.
The trademark row started in early 2011 when folk artist Bo Muller-Moore filed for trademark protection for use of the phrase on hand-screened t-shirts, which are sold in Vermont and across the country via the Eat More Kate website. Chick-fil-A subsequently sent Muller-Moore a cease and desist letter, which demanded that Moore stop using the mark because it is too similar to the company’s trademarked “Eat Mor Chickn” slogan.
In response to the demand letter, which cited 30 other instances where companies agreed to stop using similar slogans, Moore took to social media, where he garnered nearly 15,000 Facebook fans. In addition, more than 42,000 supporters signed an online petition, which called for Chick-fil-A to “stop bullying small business owners.”
In an attempt to protect its trademark, Chick-fil-A also filed a letter of protest with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which preliminarily agreed that there was a likelihood of confusion between Muller-Moore’s mark and Chick-fil-A’s advertising slogan. According to the examiner, “The marks urge action in the same way, only as to different substances, and both of them are commonly consumed types of food.”
As previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law Blog, the USPTO may refuse to grant trademark protection for marks that are likely to cause confusion with existing marks. Factors that are taken into consideration include: the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entirety as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression; similarity or dissimilarity of established, likely-to-continue trade channels; the fame of the prior mark; and the nature and extent of any actual or potential confusion.
Over a three-year period, Moore not only generated public support, but was also able to convince the USPO that a likelihood of confusion did not exist. In December, the USPTO issued a Notice of Allowance for the “Eat More Kale” mark, after no opposition was received when the mark was formally published.
Ultimately, Chick-fil-A decided to abandon its opposition to the trademark, likely for business rather than legal reasons. Its depiction of a corporate bully was far more damaging than the potential brand dilution. The fast-food company even attempted to interject humor into the situation by releasing a statement that “cows love kale too!”
As the case regarding the Eat More Kale dispute highlights, trademarks are valuable to businesses of all sizes. For more information about prosecuting a trademark application or defending your registered mark, please contact one of our experienced intellectual property lawyers.