A federal court struck down Electronic Arts’ First Amendment rights defense of artistic expression for a second time in a controversial lawsuit relating to the use of college athletes’ likenesses without their permission.
Photo courtesy of Ugur Akdemir (Unsplash.com)
The case, which may have far-reaching implications for college sports and video game makers, was originally brought against EA Sports by former Arizona quarterback Sam Keller in 2009. He alleged that the game manufacturer used his likeness without his permission, a charge that was also levied against EA Sports by Ed O’Bannon later in 2009. The cases have now been consolidated.
Although the game maker has alleged that it is protected by the First Amendment, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with a lower court ruling that EA was not protected by free speech because the company created the likeness of Keller “in the very setting in which he has achieved renown.” The court also noted that the EA game had the “same height, weight, skin tone, hair color, hairstyle, handedness, home state, play style (pocket passer), visor preference, facial features, and school year as Keller.”
“Given that NCAA football realistically portrays college football players in the context of college football games, the district court was correct in concluding that EA cannot prevail,” Judge Jay Bybee wrote in the decision.
However, the dissenting opinion in the case may gave hope to those who agree that game makers can use player images under federal law. In an argument that may be used to further EA Sports’ appeal, dissenting judge Sidney Thomas wrote that the games have creative and transformative elements that “predominate over the commercial use of the athletes’ likenesses,” according to Yahoo Sports.
“We believe the reasoning in Judge Thomas’ dissent in that decision will ultimately prevail as we seek further court review,” said EA spokesman John Reseburg.
Crypto Securities Law: When Tokens Become Investment Contracts
The application of traditional federal securities laws to crypto assets continues to evolve. In some cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers tokens and other digital assets to be securities. This makes them subject to federal securities law, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This classification has […]
The Due Diligence Process for NY Condominiums and Cooperatives
While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
