Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Detroit Lions' Suh Fined For Hit On Cleveland Browns' Quarterback
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 21, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Detroit Lions defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh received his seventh fine from the National Football League, in what is being characterized as a “contact with the forehead-hairline” hit on Cleveland Browns quarterback Brandon Weeden. Suh said he plans to appeal the $31,500 fine.
To date, Suh has been fined a total of $209,000 in his three-and-a-half-year career, and lost another $165,294 to a two-game suspension, the Detroit Free Press reports. The NFL is not shy about fining players who exhibit overly aggressive behavior on the field, but some analysts are questioning whether the league’s recent and unprecedented $765-million settlement over a class-action concussion lawsuit will prompt it to scrutinize player activities more critically. Following the decision to hand down the fine, vice president of officiating Dean Blandino told NFL Access that the move represents the league’s firm goal to “aggressively enforce the player safety fouls.”
“When I looked at the play, I felt that he did make contact with the forehead-hairline,” said Blandino. “Lowered the head and made contact with the forehead-hairline. Not with the head or neck, but the rule does prohibit that contact with the body.”
However, Suh has a number of supporters who have acknowledged the violent nature of football as a sport. Lions center Dominic Raiola called the league’s decision “ridiculous,” and suggested that while NFL safety and sports laws are necessary, each participant has a different way of analyzing plays, according to The Associated Press.
“It was a football play, to me,” Raiola told the AP. “But I guess maybe my view of football now is different than the way football is viewed now. I really don’t know what [the officials are] looking at.”
The end of the NFL’s concussion lawsuit – which was brought against the league by more than 4,500 players accusing it of negligence – is likely to have a large impact on the way officials look at safety going forward.
- Industries: Entertainment & Media
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
Common Causes of Partnership Disputes and How to Resolve Them
Business partnerships, much like marriages, function exceptionally well when partners are aligned but can become challenging when disagreements arise. Partnership disputes often stem from conflicts over business strategy, financial management, and unclear role definitions among partners. Understanding Business Partnership Conflicts Partnership conflicts place significant stress on businesses, making proactive measures essential. Partnerships should establish detailed […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.