Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Detroit finds bankruptcy deal with big banks
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: March 14, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
The city of Detroit is still in the process of seeking approval for a plan to restructure its debt, amid complaints from a number of affected parties, including pensioners of the city. In a recent development, on March 3, the city reached a deal with two large investment banks to end expensive interest rate swaps, according to Reuters. This could give the city much needed access to income from its casinos and potentially give it leverage to restructure its debt with other creditors.
The city has made two previous attempts to end the interest rate swaps, but the deals were shot down by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes, who felt that the $165 million and $230 million price tags associated with the deals were too expensive for the bankrupt city to afford, according to the news source. The new plan to terminate the swaps, which were used to hedge interest rate risks on some Detroit pension debt, would cost the city only $85 million. In a March 3 filing, the city argued for Rhodes to approve the deal, which it said could help Detroit win federal court approval of a plan to restructure its $18 billion of debt and exit bankruptcy.
This plan would give Detroit “critical funds that we can invest to improve the quality of life in Detroit,” Detroit emergency manager Kevyn Orr told CNN Money.
Judge Rhodes will still have to approve the plan before it can move forward. Rhodes’s dismissal of earlier plans was applauded by some of the city’s other creditors, because it put big banks on the same level as pensioners and other lower-priority creditors, according to the news source.
Detroit filed for protection under Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy law, which, according to Reuters, means that an approval of a deal with a single class of creditors with interests impaired by a bankruptcy could mean that the city could then seek to impose settlement terms on other creditors.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
Guardianships in New Jersey: When a Loved One Can No Longer Manage Personal or Financial Affairs
When a family member can no longer make important decisions for themself, the question is often not whether the family will step in, but whether they have the legal authority to do so. A spouse may manage household finances, or an adult child may arrange medical care and pay bills. Still, informal assistance does not […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
New Jersey’s Revised UHAC Regulations: What Residential Developers Need to Know About Affordable Housing Commitments
New Jersey residential developers with affordable housing obligations should carefully review their existing approvals, development agreements, and proposed deed restrictions in light of the State’s revised UHAC regulations (Uniform Housing Affordability Controls). The regulations, which took effect on November 6, 2025, significantly change the administration and physical requirements for affordable housing units. For developers with […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga
“No Comment” Culture: Why Silence Is Often the Riskiest Legal Strategy
A “no comment” response is sometimes the right call when a legal problem arises. As a blanket policy, however, it lets allegations go unanswered, deadlines pass, evidence disappear, and manageable disputes grow into expensive litigation. The businesses that fare best are usually the ones that say little publicly while acting decisively behind the scenes. When […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.