
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comhe city was able to hang on economically for some time before finally filing for bankruptcy in 2013. Detroit’s bankruptcy is widely expected to be the largest municipal case in U.S. history, but where does the Detroit case go from here?

Bankruptcy law is complicated, so completing a bankruptcy case isn’t as simple as filing the bankruptcy petition. Most significantly, according to USA Today, the city will need to get its creditors behind Detroit’s proposed bankruptcy plan of reorganization. While the hope is to get creditors to agree to the plan, however, that isn’t always the case.
Detroit’s plan could take effect without the approval of all creditors, however, if the city’s bankruptcy attorneys ask Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes to approve it under a “cramdown” scenario. While a complicated procedure, the “cramdown” rules allow a bankruptcy judge to approve a plan of reorganization over the objections of creditors if it is essentially fair, equitable, and nondiscriminatory.
Another thing Detroit needs to be worried about is the possibility of creditor appeals. Several creditors, and including the city’s two pension funds, have filed appeals from adverse rulings by Judge Rhodes. Depending upon how these turn out, they could impact adversely on Detroit’s ability to confirm a plan and to emerge from bankruptcy.
The city’s water department will spur the next big discussion controversy in the bankruptcy case. According to the Detroit News, the meditation on the fate of this department has is to continue in the first week of 2014. There is currently a controversial plan to spin off control of the department to help aid in the restructuring of Detroit’s $18 billion debt. In the near future, Detroit should find out whether the department will be leased, sold or transferred.
This bankruptcy case is far from over, and it will be interesting to see where it goes from here.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!