Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Detroit decries creditors' request to delay bankruptcy plan
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: April 11, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Detroit is expected shortly to file an amended bankruptcy restructuring plan, which is anticipated to add details to emergency manager Kevyn Orr’s first version of the plan, according to Detroit Free Press. The amended plan will allow the city to leave bankruptcy with significantly less debt and to invest $1.5 billion over the next decade in blight removal, police and fire protection, and other essential needs.
The new plan may also provide new terms for creditors, as well as adjusted financial projections, according to the news source. New details about the terms of this ‘grand bargain,’ which involves a pledge of $815 million from foundations, the state government and the Detroit Institute of Arts to reduce pension cuts and keep the museum from selling its artwork, are also anticipated. The news source notes, however, that significant changes to the original plan are not expected.
Even so, Syncora Guarantee and Syncora Capital Assurance, which insure or have exposure to more than $600 million of Detroit’s debt, have requested an additional two weeks to review the amended disclosure statement for the new plan, according to The Detroit News. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes set a deadline of April 3 for creditors to file objections to the proposal, which Syncora argued only gives creditors 48 hours to review and object to the statement.
Detroit accused the creditor of employing a “scorched earth litigation strategy” to delay the city’s bankruptcy exit, the news source reported.
“Although it dresses up its request for relief as a plea for the preservation of due process, Syncora merely seeks more disruption and delay,” Detroit bankruptcy attorney Heather Lennox wrote, according to The Detroit News. ” … Syncora’s argument that the potential for relatively modest revisions to objections that parties have had nearly 40 days to prepare constitutes a deprivation of due process is not credible and generates far more heat than light.”
City spokesman Bill Nowling said that the city is confident that Judge Rhodes will keep to the court’s original April 3 schedule, the news source explained.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.