Counterfeit Goods Pose Growing IP Enforcement Challenge
Counterfeit goods are most likely to come from China and India, according to a new report by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation (OECD) and Development and the European Union Intellectual Property Office. The report also highlights the role of e-commerce in fostering piracy and counterfeiting, as well as increasing the challenge of protecting intellectual property rights.
The report, entitled “Mapping the Real Routes of Trade in Fake Goods,” estimates that the total import value of counterfeit and pirated goods in 2013 was $461 billion. “Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods is a vital threat to modern, innovation-driven economies, a worldwide phenomenon that grows in scope and magnitude,” the OECD said in a press statement. “Counterfeiters ship infringing products via complex routes, with many intermediary points, which poses a substantial challenge to efficient enforcement.”
According to the OECD report, China and Hong Kong were identified as the place of origin of 80 percent of the fakes seized by authorities. They are also the top producers in 9 out of the 10 top counterfeit categories: electronics, jewelry, optical/photographic/medical equipment, clothing and textiles, pharmaceuticals, footwear, foodstuff, toys and games, leather and handbags, and perfume.
The report also examined the complex routes of trade in counterfeit pirated goods. It found that 63 percent of seized counterfeit goods were transported via postal and express delivery services. As noted by the OECD, this poses a significant challenge for law enforcement.
Role of Customs and Border Protection in Protecting IP
In policing U.S. borders, CBP is authorized to exclude, detain and/or seize imported merchandise that infringes federally registered and recorded trademarks and copyrights and/or is covered by an exclusion order issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission. It is also the legal authority to make substantive determinations regarding infringement of trademarks and copyrights, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, the Lanham Act of 1946, the Copyright Act of 1976, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998.
Earlier this year, the CBP announced that it seized a record number of shipments containing goods that violated Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in FY2016. Seizures of counterfeit and pirated goods rose nine percent in FY2016. The CBP reported that the total estimated manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of the 31,560 seized goods, had they been genuine, was more than $1.38 billion.
To help prevent imports or exports of infringing goods, businesses should record their trademarks and copyrights with CBP. The process is fairly straightforward and may be done online via the Intellectual Property Rights e-Recordation (IPRR) application. The recordation fee for copyrights is $190. The recordation fee for trademarks is $190 per International Class of goods. The benefit of recordation is that information, including photographs of your genuine products, is readily available to CBP personnel at the borders.
The CBP also encourages IP owners to submit allegations of infringing shipments or conduct to CBP via its e-Allegations website. The agency then uses the information, which can be submitted anonymously, to target counterfeiting activities and may refer cases for criminal investigations.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Adrian Lee, at 201-806-3364.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
