
John M. Scagnelli
Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: John M. Scagnelli
Date: August 18, 2016
Partner
201-896-4100 jscagnelli@sh-law.comRemediating environmentally contaminated property in New Jersey can be extremely costly for businesses across the state. To help ease the burden, property owners may be able to reduce the local property tax assessment on the property until the clean-up is completed.
A growing body of New Jersey Tax Court law supports the argument that local property tax assessments of contaminated property undergoing environmental remediation should be eligible for reduction, particularly when the contamination hinders development.
In Methode Electronics, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, 28 N.J. Tax 298 (Tax 2015), the Tax Court reduced the property tax assessment of an industrial property to a nominal amount. In reaching its decision, the court concluded that the evidence established that it is not reasonably likely that the subject property could be used or developed at any point in the foreseeable future.
In support, the Tax Court noted that the state’s highest court has held that environmental contamination has an impact on property valuation for local property tax purposes. In Inmar Assocs., Inc. v. Borough of Carlstadt, 112 N.J. 593 (1988), the Supreme Court of New Jersey specifically held that where environmental contamination drives “down the value of commercial property potentially subject to cleanup costs, the effect of those market forces cannot be ignored in the assessment process simply because it would be counter to the environmental policy.”
In the wake of Inmar, the Tax Court has adopted several different approaches to determining the proper tax assessment, with the approach dictated by the nature and extent of the environmental contamination and remediation. In Metuchen I, LLC v. Borough of Metuchen, 21 N.J. Tax 283 (Tax 2004), the Tax Court determined the taxable value of a contaminated property by formulating a true market value as if the property were clean and discounted the remediation costs over the estimated remediation period to arrive at a taxable value.
Given the new legal developments, owners of contaminated property should explore the option of filing of property tax appeals.
Under the terms of the settlement, the property tax assessment of an environmentally contaminated property undergoing environmental remediation was reduced for all five tax years in contest: $943,300 reductions for tax years 2011 and 2012, $1,972,000 reductions for tax years 2013, 2014, and 2015 and $2,220,000 reduction for tax year 2016. Going forward, the property tax assessment for years 2017-2023 will be $100,000 until environmental remediation is completed and the property is available for development and/or occupancy prior to 2023.
The Scarinci Hollenbeck Environmental and Land Use Group was recently successful in negotiating a New Jersey Tax Court property tax appeal with the Borough of Carlstadt. Otherwise, if you wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me, John Scagnelli.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Remediating environmentally contaminated property in New Jersey can be extremely costly for businesses across the state. To help ease the burden, property owners may be able to reduce the local property tax assessment on the property until the clean-up is completed.
A growing body of New Jersey Tax Court law supports the argument that local property tax assessments of contaminated property undergoing environmental remediation should be eligible for reduction, particularly when the contamination hinders development.
In Methode Electronics, Inc. v. Township of Willingboro, 28 N.J. Tax 298 (Tax 2015), the Tax Court reduced the property tax assessment of an industrial property to a nominal amount. In reaching its decision, the court concluded that the evidence established that it is not reasonably likely that the subject property could be used or developed at any point in the foreseeable future.
In support, the Tax Court noted that the state’s highest court has held that environmental contamination has an impact on property valuation for local property tax purposes. In Inmar Assocs., Inc. v. Borough of Carlstadt, 112 N.J. 593 (1988), the Supreme Court of New Jersey specifically held that where environmental contamination drives “down the value of commercial property potentially subject to cleanup costs, the effect of those market forces cannot be ignored in the assessment process simply because it would be counter to the environmental policy.”
In the wake of Inmar, the Tax Court has adopted several different approaches to determining the proper tax assessment, with the approach dictated by the nature and extent of the environmental contamination and remediation. In Metuchen I, LLC v. Borough of Metuchen, 21 N.J. Tax 283 (Tax 2004), the Tax Court determined the taxable value of a contaminated property by formulating a true market value as if the property were clean and discounted the remediation costs over the estimated remediation period to arrive at a taxable value.
Given the new legal developments, owners of contaminated property should explore the option of filing of property tax appeals.
Under the terms of the settlement, the property tax assessment of an environmentally contaminated property undergoing environmental remediation was reduced for all five tax years in contest: $943,300 reductions for tax years 2011 and 2012, $1,972,000 reductions for tax years 2013, 2014, and 2015 and $2,220,000 reduction for tax year 2016. Going forward, the property tax assessment for years 2017-2023 will be $100,000 until environmental remediation is completed and the property is available for development and/or occupancy prior to 2023.
The Scarinci Hollenbeck Environmental and Land Use Group was recently successful in negotiating a New Jersey Tax Court property tax appeal with the Borough of Carlstadt. Otherwise, if you wish to discuss this matter further, please contact me, John Scagnelli.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!