Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
City Pension Funds Continue to Cause Stir in Detroit Bankruptcy
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Last July, the city of Detroit filed for protection under federal bankruptcy law, as it had an estimated $18 billion to $20 billion in debt – making it the largest municipal filing in the history of the U.S.
It hasn’t been easy going for Detroit, and its bankruptcy case has met numerous headwinds – many of which result from positions taken by the city’s pension funds. Now, the city has struck back, filing a lawsuit in bankruptcy court to invalidate $1.44 billion in debt sold to fund public worker pensions.
Detroit has asked Judge Steven Rhodes to rule that it is no longer obligated to make payments on the pension certificates of participation, which were issued when Kwame Kilpatrick was mayor. Mr. Kilpatrick is now in federal prison for corruption.
“This deal was bad for the city from its onset despite reassurances it would adequately resolve the city’s pension issues,” Kevyn Orr, Detroit’s state-appointed emergency manager, said in a statement. “We have tried[,] without success, to negotiate a resolution to this dispute and to allow the city and its taxpayers to move forward and unwind these illegal transaction.”
It could be worse for the city’s pension funds though. Under the current proposal for Detroit’s bankruptcy plan of adjustment, the pension claimants are expected to receive a larger distribution on their claims than will the bankers and bondholders. Specifically, Detroit’s plan would provide more money from the city to pension funds than to two large Wall Street Banks – UBS and Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Unfortunately, Judge Rhodes has already turned down two previous proposals to lower the pay-off on the funds owed to these banks.
More to follow, as this battle develops.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
BESS Interconnection: Managing Grid, Cost, and Schedule Risk
For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress
Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey
For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.