Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
City Pension Funds Continue to Cause Stir in Detroit Bankruptcy
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: February 7, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
Last July, the city of Detroit filed for protection under federal bankruptcy law, as it had an estimated $18 billion to $20 billion in debt – making it the largest municipal filing in the history of the U.S.
It hasn’t been easy going for Detroit, and its bankruptcy case has met numerous headwinds – many of which result from positions taken by the city’s pension funds. Now, the city has struck back, filing a lawsuit in bankruptcy court to invalidate $1.44 billion in debt sold to fund public worker pensions.
Detroit has asked Judge Steven Rhodes to rule that it is no longer obligated to make payments on the pension certificates of participation, which were issued when Kwame Kilpatrick was mayor. Mr. Kilpatrick is now in federal prison for corruption.
“This deal was bad for the city from its onset despite reassurances it would adequately resolve the city’s pension issues,” Kevyn Orr, Detroit’s state-appointed emergency manager, said in a statement. “We have tried[,] without success, to negotiate a resolution to this dispute and to allow the city and its taxpayers to move forward and unwind these illegal transaction.”
It could be worse for the city’s pension funds though. Under the current proposal for Detroit’s bankruptcy plan of adjustment, the pension claimants are expected to receive a larger distribution on their claims than will the bankers and bondholders. Specifically, Detroit’s plan would provide more money from the city to pension funds than to two large Wall Street Banks – UBS and Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Unfortunately, Judge Rhodes has already turned down two previous proposals to lower the pay-off on the funds owed to these banks.
More to follow, as this battle develops.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies
How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses
Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities
On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make
Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.