Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 4, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMalicious insiders and disgruntled employees are one of the greatest security threats to U.S. businesses. While the same would be true for the federal government, the recent CIA controversy adds a unique perspective to that reality. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) recently admitted to hacking a computer network used by the Senate Intelligence Committee. As expected, Congress is up in arms over the revelation particularly because of earlier denials of such conduct.
According to the CIA inspector general’s report released on July 31, 2014, several agency employees searched Senate computers and staff emails for information about the committee’s investigation into interrogation techniques used in the wake of the September 11 attacks. These employees “acted in a manner inconsistent with the common understanding” between the CIA and the Senate committee regarding the use of the computer network, the report states.
The admissions confirm concerns raised by Sen. Diane Feinstein in March 2014 when she alleged on the Senate floor that the CIA was attempting to impede the committee’s investigation into suspected torture al Qaida detainees. The findings also appear to contradict the earlier position taken by CIA Director John Brennan. “As far as the allegations of the CIA hacking into Senate computers, nothing could be further from the truth… That’s beyond the scope of reason,” Brennan said at the time.
According to a CIA statement in response to the report, Brennan has apologized to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee and referred the report to an accountability board, which Feinstein acknowledged is a good first step.
“The investigation confirmed what I said on the Senate floor in March—CIA personnel inappropriately searched Senate Intelligence Committee computers in violation of an agreement we had reached, and I believe in violation of the constitutional separation of powers,” Feinstein said.
While the CIA’s conduct is shocking, data breaches by company or even government insiders are not uncommon. According to recent studies, nearly 60 percent of data security breaches are attributed to inside threats, from former employees to current business partners.
Thanks to technology, employees can access key business data from numerous devices from a variety of locations. However, the same tools that make our lives easier also put information at risk. Therefore, it is imperative to take steps to improve data security, which should include technological safeguards such as passwords and legal protections such as confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss the issues involved, please contact me, Fernando Pinguelo, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouseWatch (http://ewhwblog.com).
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!