Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 24, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWell-known CEOs like Elon Musk, Richard Branson, and Mark Cuban have millions of Twitter followers. This evidences and enhances the strength of their brands, but also exposes them to liability.

Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk recently drew the ire of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when he tweeted to his 22.3 million followers on Twitter that he was planning to take his company private. On August 7, 2018, Musk tweeted: “Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured.” Following this tweet, Tesla’s stock price jumped by over six percent, a significant impact on the market that many attributed to the tweet. The impact was keenly felt by short-sellers, with whom Musk had been feuding. Tesla later confirmed that a final decision about taking the company private had not yet been reached.
The SEC responded with an enforcement action against Musk and Tesla, alleging that Musk made false and misleading public statements about taking Tesla private in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Pursuant to a settlement with the SEC, Musk and Tesla would be required to each pay $20 million penalties, and Musk must step down as Chairman of the Board for at least three years. The settlement agreement is being reviewed. Elon Musk’s further statements on Twitter, which were followed by a 2% dip in company value in after-hour trading, indicates he will continue to use Twitter in the same manner.

Musk isn’t the first CEO to make a social media mistake. In 2014, the SEC investigated a Facebook post by NETFLIX CEO Reed Hastings. The post stated: Congrats to Ted Sarandos and his amazing content licensing team. Netflix monthly viewing exceeded 1 billion hours for the first time ever in June. When House of Cards and Arrested Development debut, we’ll blow these records away. Keep going, Ted, we need even more!
The SEC subsequently issued a Wells Notice alleging that Netflix ran afoul of Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD). Regulation FD requires that a publicly traded company immediately release to the general public any material non-public information that it has disclosed to certain individuals outside of the company. The goal is to promote full and fair disclosure.
Acknowledging that there had been a great deal of uncertainty about how the rule applies to social media, the SEC elected to publish the results of its investigation into Hastings rather than take enforcement action. It also provided additional guidance. Under the SEC’s revised social media policy, companies can use Facebook and Twitter and similar sites to announce key information in compliance with Regulation FD, so long as investors have been alerted about which social media will be used to disseminate such information.
As the SEC explained, “[A]lthough every case must be evaluated on its own facts, disclosure of material, nonpublic information on the personal social media site of an individual corporate officer – without advance notice to investors that the site may be used for this purpose – is unlikely to qualify as an acceptable method of disclosure under the securities laws. Personal social media sites of individuals employed by a public company would not ordinarily be assumed to be channels through which the company would disclose material corporate information.”
In 2013, Tesla followed the SEC’s Regulation FD policy in announcing that it intended to use Musk’s Twitter account as a means of announcing material information about Tesla. It said: “Tesla investors and others should note that we announce material information to the public about our company, products, and services and other issues through a variety of means, including Tesla’s Website, press releases, SEC filings, blogs, and social media.” Tesla specifically encouraged investors to review Musk’s tweets, advising: “Please follow Elon Musk’s and Tesla’s Twitter accounts: twitter.com/elonmusk and twitter.com/TeslaMotors.”
However, the SEC still found that Musk’s September 9 tweet crossed the line. According to the SEC’s complaint, Tesla statements were inadequate because the company had no disclosure controls or procedures in place to determine whether Musk’s tweets contained the information required to be disclosed in Tesla’s SEC filings. In addition, the company allegedly lacked sufficient processes in place to ensure that Musk’s tweets were accurate or complete.
The SEC’s complaint further alleged that Musk’s Twitter statements were misleading. According to the SEC, despite his tweets suggesting that the going private transaction was nearly final, Musk knew that the potential transaction was uncertain and subject to numerous contingencies.
Musk and Tesla ultimately agreed to settle the charges against them without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations. Among other relief, the settlements require that:
As the SEC’s enforcement actions against Company CEOs highlight, social media posts by CEOs and other top executives can be a risk center for a company. Stock volatility, Regulation FD violation or other SEC disclosure violations, lawsuits and consumer complaints can result from CEO statements on social media. Therefore, public companies (and even private companies) should be making sure they have:
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jeffrey Cassin, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Portability of estate and gift tax enables a surviving spouse to inherit any unused portion of their deceased spouse’s federal estate and gift tax exemption. So, if one spouse doesn’t utilize their full exemption, the surviving spouse can effectively double their exemption amount with regard to estate tax liability. For married couples, portability offers a […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many of us, pets are more than companions—they are members of the family. Yet they are often overlooked or inadequately provided for when it comes to estate planning. A pet trust offers a legally enforceable way to ensure that your animal continues to receive proper care if you become incapacitated or pass away. As […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

For many New Jersey business owners, a closely held company represents decades of work, financial investment, and personal sacrifice. Trusts in business succession planning are one of the most effective tools for protecting that value, allowing founders to control how and when the business passes to the next generation while reducing the risk of disputes, […]
Author: George McGowan

In today’s digital economy, New Jersey businesses of all sizes rely heavily on technology vendors, software providers, cloud platforms, and managed IT services. Whether your company is purchasing software, migrating data to the cloud, engaging a cybersecurity consultant, or entering into a long-term managed services agreement, a careful IT contract review can have significant operational, […]
Author: George McGowan

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!