
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 1, 2013
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFor the first time in history, a United States Court of Appeals has been given the task of determining whether elusive rent-stabilized leases can be treated as assets under bankruptcy law. The outcome could affect thousands of Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases in New York City and, perhaps, in other urban areas with similar rent protection programs.
The New York Times recently highlighted the financial plight of Mary Veronica Santiago, who was forced to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy after falling behind on her credit obligations. Although Santiago – who resides in a rent-stabilized apartment in New York – has stayed current on her rental payments, the Chapter 7 trustee overseeing her case is attempting to treat her lease as a bankruptcy asset. This follows from the offer by Santiago’s landlord to buy out the rent-stabilized lease. The Chapter 7 trustee argues that this would provide needed cash to pay Santiago’s creditors and that the lease is a valuable asset that the trustee is authorized to sell. Thus far, both the bankruptcy court and the district court have sided with the trustee in treating the lease as an asset.
The attorneys for Santiago are disputing this, arguing that rent-stabilized leases are considered a public assistance benefit, similar to Social Security or disability payments, and should therefore be exempt from the bankruptcy estate’s reach, the news source reported. Further, her representatives argue that the New York laws attached to rent-stabilization are designed specifically to protect individuals who qualify for affordable housing assistance, a protection that would be in jeopardy if bankruptcy courts were permitted to treat them as assets.
One of the bigger questions surrounding the case is whether treating rent-stabilized leases as a bankruptcy asset will upset housing stability and threaten low-income families, many of whom are already susceptible to financial struggles and an increased bankruptcy risk.
“It’s an unfair money-grab,” David Shaev, New York state chairman of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, told the Times. “To remove this foundation, this safety net, it’s unconscionable.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
For the first time in history, a United States Court of Appeals has been given the task of determining whether elusive rent-stabilized leases can be treated as assets under bankruptcy law. The outcome could affect thousands of Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases in New York City and, perhaps, in other urban areas with similar rent protection programs.
The New York Times recently highlighted the financial plight of Mary Veronica Santiago, who was forced to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy after falling behind on her credit obligations. Although Santiago – who resides in a rent-stabilized apartment in New York – has stayed current on her rental payments, the Chapter 7 trustee overseeing her case is attempting to treat her lease as a bankruptcy asset. This follows from the offer by Santiago’s landlord to buy out the rent-stabilized lease. The Chapter 7 trustee argues that this would provide needed cash to pay Santiago’s creditors and that the lease is a valuable asset that the trustee is authorized to sell. Thus far, both the bankruptcy court and the district court have sided with the trustee in treating the lease as an asset.
The attorneys for Santiago are disputing this, arguing that rent-stabilized leases are considered a public assistance benefit, similar to Social Security or disability payments, and should therefore be exempt from the bankruptcy estate’s reach, the news source reported. Further, her representatives argue that the New York laws attached to rent-stabilization are designed specifically to protect individuals who qualify for affordable housing assistance, a protection that would be in jeopardy if bankruptcy courts were permitted to treat them as assets.
One of the bigger questions surrounding the case is whether treating rent-stabilized leases as a bankruptcy asset will upset housing stability and threaten low-income families, many of whom are already susceptible to financial struggles and an increased bankruptcy risk.
“It’s an unfair money-grab,” David Shaev, New York state chairman of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, told the Times. “To remove this foundation, this safety net, it’s unconscionable.”
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!