
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 1, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFor the first time in history, a United States Court of Appeals has been given the task of determining whether elusive rent-stabilized leases can be treated as assets under bankruptcy law. The outcome could affect thousands of Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases in New York City and, perhaps, in other urban areas with similar rent protection programs.
The New York Times recently highlighted the financial plight of Mary Veronica Santiago, who was forced to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy after falling behind on her credit obligations. Although Santiago – who resides in a rent-stabilized apartment in New York – has stayed current on her rental payments, the Chapter 7 trustee overseeing her case is attempting to treat her lease as a bankruptcy asset. This follows from the offer by Santiago’s landlord to buy out the rent-stabilized lease. The Chapter 7 trustee argues that this would provide needed cash to pay Santiago’s creditors and that the lease is a valuable asset that the trustee is authorized to sell. Thus far, both the bankruptcy court and the district court have sided with the trustee in treating the lease as an asset.
The attorneys for Santiago are disputing this, arguing that rent-stabilized leases are considered a public assistance benefit, similar to Social Security or disability payments, and should therefore be exempt from the bankruptcy estate’s reach, the news source reported. Further, her representatives argue that the New York laws attached to rent-stabilization are designed specifically to protect individuals who qualify for affordable housing assistance, a protection that would be in jeopardy if bankruptcy courts were permitted to treat them as assets.
One of the bigger questions surrounding the case is whether treating rent-stabilized leases as a bankruptcy asset will upset housing stability and threaten low-income families, many of whom are already susceptible to financial struggles and an increased bankruptcy risk.
“It’s an unfair money-grab,” David Shaev, New York state chairman of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, told the Times. “To remove this foundation, this safety net, it’s unconscionable.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich

Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!