Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Can a Rent-Stabilized Lease be Treated as a Bankruptcy Asset?
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
For the first time in history, a United States Court of Appeals has been given the task of determining whether elusive rent-stabilized leases can be treated as assets under bankruptcy law. The outcome could affect thousands of Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases in New York City and, perhaps, in other urban areas with similar rent protection programs.
The New York Times recently highlighted the financial plight of Mary Veronica Santiago, who was forced to file Chapter 7 bankruptcy after falling behind on her credit obligations. Although Santiago – who resides in a rent-stabilized apartment in New York – has stayed current on her rental payments, the Chapter 7 trustee overseeing her case is attempting to treat her lease as a bankruptcy asset. This follows from the offer by Santiago’s landlord to buy out the rent-stabilized lease. The Chapter 7 trustee argues that this would provide needed cash to pay Santiago’s creditors and that the lease is a valuable asset that the trustee is authorized to sell. Thus far, both the bankruptcy court and the district court have sided with the trustee in treating the lease as an asset.
The attorneys for Santiago are disputing this, arguing that rent-stabilized leases are considered a public assistance benefit, similar to Social Security or disability payments, and should therefore be exempt from the bankruptcy estate’s reach, the news source reported. Further, her representatives argue that the New York laws attached to rent-stabilization are designed specifically to protect individuals who qualify for affordable housing assistance, a protection that would be in jeopardy if bankruptcy courts were permitted to treat them as assets.
One of the bigger questions surrounding the case is whether treating rent-stabilized leases as a bankruptcy asset will upset housing stability and threaten low-income families, many of whom are already susceptible to financial struggles and an increased bankruptcy risk.
“It’s an unfair money-grab,” David Shaev, New York state chairman of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, told the Times. “To remove this foundation, this safety net, it’s unconscionable.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.