Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 9, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA California measure that would have tied the state tax rate on publicly traded companies to the ratio between the CEO’s salary and that of the median worker stalled in the state’s Senate, according to the Associated Press.
The measure would have decreased the tax rate in the state – currently 8.84 percent of net income for businesses and 10.84 percent for banks – to 7 percent for any company whose CEO is paid less than 25 times the median salary of a worker in that company, the news source explained. Companies that pay their chief executive more than that would see an increasing tax rate on a sliding scale, passing the current tax rate when the CEO’s pay exceeds 100 times the median pay. The top tax rate would come to 13 percent for companies in which the CEO is paid more than 400 times the median salary of its employees.
“This is not to vilify those individuals,” said Sen. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord, before the vote. “They work hard. They are creative. But from a historical standpoint, this is not a sustainable model for us to maintain. Income inequality is a huge threat to California’s economic growth and stability.”
DeSaulnier noted the difference between this ratio today and 30 years ago, citing two CEOs of Disney, according to the Associated Press. Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner received a salary of $750,000 in 1984, a figure that was approximately 37.5 times the salary of the “typical worker.” By contrast, Robert Iger, the current CEO of Disney, receives a salary of $34.3 million, approximately 974 times the median pay of a Disney employee.
Katie Orr, the state government reporter for Capital Public Radio, reported that DeSaulnier was not able to get the votes needed to pass the bill. Numerous business groups opposed the bill on the grounds that it would drive business away from the state and dramatically increase corporate taxes, and several in DeSaulnier’s own party voted against the bill.
Sen. Steve Knight, R-Palmdale, said that the bill was “un-American,” and that governments should not tell companies what to do, according to the Associated Press.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s tax,trust, and estate matters , please contact me, Frank L. Brunetti at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!