Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 9, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comA California measure that would have tied the state tax rate on publicly traded companies to the ratio between the CEO’s salary and that of the median worker stalled in the state’s Senate, according to the Associated Press.
The measure would have decreased the tax rate in the state – currently 8.84 percent of net income for businesses and 10.84 percent for banks – to 7 percent for any company whose CEO is paid less than 25 times the median salary of a worker in that company, the news source explained. Companies that pay their chief executive more than that would see an increasing tax rate on a sliding scale, passing the current tax rate when the CEO’s pay exceeds 100 times the median pay. The top tax rate would come to 13 percent for companies in which the CEO is paid more than 400 times the median salary of its employees.
“This is not to vilify those individuals,” said Sen. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord, before the vote. “They work hard. They are creative. But from a historical standpoint, this is not a sustainable model for us to maintain. Income inequality is a huge threat to California’s economic growth and stability.”
DeSaulnier noted the difference between this ratio today and 30 years ago, citing two CEOs of Disney, according to the Associated Press. Former Disney CEO Michael Eisner received a salary of $750,000 in 1984, a figure that was approximately 37.5 times the salary of the “typical worker.” By contrast, Robert Iger, the current CEO of Disney, receives a salary of $34.3 million, approximately 974 times the median pay of a Disney employee.
Katie Orr, the state government reporter for Capital Public Radio, reported that DeSaulnier was not able to get the votes needed to pass the bill. Numerous business groups opposed the bill on the grounds that it would drive business away from the state and dramatically increase corporate taxes, and several in DeSaulnier’s own party voted against the bill.
Sen. Steve Knight, R-Palmdale, said that the bill was “un-American,” and that governments should not tell companies what to do, according to the Associated Press.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss your company’s tax,trust, and estate matters , please contact me, Frank L. Brunetti at ScarinciHollenbeck.com.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!