
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: September 28, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThis came after it ended negotiations with first-lien creditors who did not approve the company’s massive reorganization plan for its largest operating division, Caesars Entertainment Operating Co.
A bankruptcy judge had previously ruled that the company could not pursue an accelerated appeal from the court’s decision to reject the restructuring plan, which would have enabled bondholders to pursue lawsuits against Caesars.
The agreement is effective immediately and has now received full support from senior lenders, according to a Bloomberg report. This new deal is significant because it involved its two largest debt holders, with obligations totaling $11.7 billion. Further, the company stated that this is the first step toward establishing a revised restructuring plan in the near future.
Recent bankruptcy filings note that the new agreement would eliminate $19.9 billion in total obligations for the CEOC by redistributing the debt to several new Caesars companies.
The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. in January. In its bankruptcy plan, Caesars intended to convert the CEOC into a real estate investment trust, which would effectively separate the division into two companies. The CEOC would become a real estate investment trust owning the property and the building as an operating company leasing the casinos.
The company claimed that the CEOC has become insolvent, accounting for $18.4 billion of Caesars Entertainment Corp.’s $22.8 billion debt, the largest debt total in the casino gaming industry. With the move, Caesars would have effectively eliminated $10 billion in debt from its books.
In July, Caesars obtained support for the reorganization plan from 80 percent of its first and second tier debt holders, which would have provided the company with a six-month exit from bankruptcy. However, 20 percent of creditors rejected the deal. In turn, second-lien creditors have filed multiple lawsuits over the transfer of the casino properties into Caesars Growth Partners, which would have been folded back into Caesars Entertainment Co. Caesars’ plan to restructure Caesars Palace, Caesars Atlantic City, Harrah’s Reno and various other regional casino properties still remains in jeopardy with the rejected plan, despite the approved agreement.
In a statement to the court Aug. 17, Caesars explained that it outlined numerous offers for creditors, which included cash payouts between five to ten percent of the value of the CEOC’s first and second-tier bank debt as part of the REIT created with the CEOC. Caesars would then pay out 25 percent of its free cash flow to compensate second-lien creditors and holders of the bank debt on an annual basis. All told, Caesars would make an initial payment of $62.5 million to all creditors. Company officials also explained in court papers that it will not be able to fulfill its debt repayments without reaching a restructuring deal with its full list of creditors.
Currently though, the specific details of the rejected plan remain the same, but Caesars is working with its senior debt holders to revise the reorganization of the CEOC.
Caesars also intends to appeal the court’s decision not to accelerate its appeal of the rejected plan by citing four lawsuits sought by bondholders that could potentially force the entire company into insolvency. However, the company still needs most of its second-lien bondholders to approve a new restructuring plan to prevent these lawsuits.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!