
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: September 28, 2015

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThis came after it ended negotiations with first-lien creditors who did not approve the company’s massive reorganization plan for its largest operating division, Caesars Entertainment Operating Co.
A bankruptcy judge had previously ruled that the company could not pursue an accelerated appeal from the court’s decision to reject the restructuring plan, which would have enabled bondholders to pursue lawsuits against Caesars.
The agreement is effective immediately and has now received full support from senior lenders, according to a Bloomberg report. This new deal is significant because it involved its two largest debt holders, with obligations totaling $11.7 billion. Further, the company stated that this is the first step toward establishing a revised restructuring plan in the near future.
Recent bankruptcy filings note that the new agreement would eliminate $19.9 billion in total obligations for the CEOC by redistributing the debt to several new Caesars companies.
The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. in January. In its bankruptcy plan, Caesars intended to convert the CEOC into a real estate investment trust, which would effectively separate the division into two companies. The CEOC would become a real estate investment trust owning the property and the building as an operating company leasing the casinos.
The company claimed that the CEOC has become insolvent, accounting for $18.4 billion of Caesars Entertainment Corp.’s $22.8 billion debt, the largest debt total in the casino gaming industry. With the move, Caesars would have effectively eliminated $10 billion in debt from its books.
In July, Caesars obtained support for the reorganization plan from 80 percent of its first and second tier debt holders, which would have provided the company with a six-month exit from bankruptcy. However, 20 percent of creditors rejected the deal. In turn, second-lien creditors have filed multiple lawsuits over the transfer of the casino properties into Caesars Growth Partners, which would have been folded back into Caesars Entertainment Co. Caesars’ plan to restructure Caesars Palace, Caesars Atlantic City, Harrah’s Reno and various other regional casino properties still remains in jeopardy with the rejected plan, despite the approved agreement.
In a statement to the court Aug. 17, Caesars explained that it outlined numerous offers for creditors, which included cash payouts between five to ten percent of the value of the CEOC’s first and second-tier bank debt as part of the REIT created with the CEOC. Caesars would then pay out 25 percent of its free cash flow to compensate second-lien creditors and holders of the bank debt on an annual basis. All told, Caesars would make an initial payment of $62.5 million to all creditors. Company officials also explained in court papers that it will not be able to fulfill its debt repayments without reaching a restructuring deal with its full list of creditors.
Currently though, the specific details of the rejected plan remain the same, but Caesars is working with its senior debt holders to revise the reorganization of the CEOC.
Caesars also intends to appeal the court’s decision not to accelerate its appeal of the rejected plan by citing four lawsuits sought by bondholders that could potentially force the entire company into insolvency. However, the company still needs most of its second-lien bondholders to approve a new restructuring plan to prevent these lawsuits.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

The application of traditional federal securities laws to crypto assets continues to evolve. In some cases, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) considers tokens and other digital assets to be securities. This makes them subject to federal securities law, including the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This classification has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro

Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins

Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano

Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!