
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: November 5, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe highly publicized trial that will determine Detroit’s eligibility to file the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history kicked off on Oct. 23, with the expected opposition from creditors and labor unions.
Representatives for the city are urging U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes to approve the city’s petition to file for protection under Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy law, arguing that this is the only way Detroit can avoid a loss of 65 cents of every tax dollar being allocated to debt and other obligations. Should this occur, the city says it would have insufficient funding to maintain the public services that the city’s 700,000 residents rely upon, The Associated Press reported. If Judge Rhodes agrees with the argument, Detroit would be permitted to attempt to restructure roughly $18 billion in debt through municipal bankruptcy proceedings.
However, the list of creditors and pensioners opposing the city’s eligibility is long, and the labor unions argue that the city had failed to negotiate with the creditors in good faith – a key precondition that must be satisfied before a city or county can seek municipal bankruptcy protection. Sharon Levine, who represents Michigan Council 25 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, said that Detroit officials made unreasonable offers over the summer, rather than taking the time to explore all options, USA Today reported.
“Detroit has a lot of problems,” Levine told reporters. “It was the biggest Chapter 9 that was ever filed. If there are huge problems, perhaps we should have taken a little time to consider them.”
The trial will be closely watched by legal analysts, creditors, pension funds, and officials of financially distressed cities that may be contemplating bankruptcy. The proceedings – if permitted to move forward – will also set a landmark precedent for the treatment of pension obligations during municipal bankruptcies.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!