Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 24, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comTo keep employees safe and avoid liability from distracted driving, businesses should consider adopting comprehensive cell phone policies.
As a reminder about how dangerous distracted driving can be, it’s important to look at the statistics. In 2013, 3,154 people were killed and 424,000 were injured in motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers. The National Safety Council (NSC) estimates that one-quarter of all crashes involve cell phones.
Despite the risks, many drivers still don’t put down their phones while driving. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that at any given daylight moment across America, approximately 660,000 drivers are using cell phones or manipulating electronic devices while driving.
While they are more prone to cell phone use behind the wheel, teens are not the only offenders. With the growing popularity of smartphones, employees frequently conduct business outside of the office. In fact, a recent NHTSA survey found that drivers cite work-related communications as a reason to use phones while driving.
Under the doctrine of respondeat superior, an employer may be held legally accountable for the negligence of its employee, if the employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment at the time of a driving accident.
As highlighted by the NSC, one company paid $24.7 million after a tractor-trailer driver ran into ten vehicles while reading a text message. Another paid $16.1 million when a salesperson who was talking on a cell phone while in route to a meeting crashed and injured another driver.
Of course, simply having a policy in place is not enough to avoid liability. Businesses must also train employees about the importance of safe driving, monitor compliance, and strictly enforce violations.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!