Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Bondholders Confront CalPERS in San Bernardino Bankruptcy Case
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: January 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Creditors who are the city’s bondholders in the San Bernardino, California, bankruptcy case are displeased with the position taken by the California Public Employees’ Retirement System – or CalPERS – and they are taking their concerns to court.
The bondholders filed a legal protest against CalPERS, arguing that the pension fund is seeking preferential treatment in the bankruptcy case. In their 114-page protest, the bondholders said they have the same rights as the pension fund and are prepared to take the fight all the way to the Supreme Court to prevent CalPERS from obtaining permission from the court to sue the city on its pension obligations. They argue that allowing the pension fund to sue San Bernardino could result in tens of millions of dollars in losses for the Wall Street bondholders.
Immediately following San Bernardino’s appeal for Chapter 9 protection under bankruptcy law in August, CalPERS demanded the right to sue the city. San Bernardino fell behind on $6.9 million in pension payments after it filed for bankruptcy.
CalPERS group argues that the pension obligations of member cities must be met no matter what – an argument that encouraged the city of Vallejo to continue making payments following its bankruptcy in 2008, according to the Sacramento Bee. CalPERS said that California state law supports their bid to primacy, and that pension contributions cannot be reduced even in the event of bankruptcy.
Despite these arguments, the city said it plans to resume payments in July 2013, and also asks to restructure its current debt to lower the amount it must pay.
CalPERS is the city’s biggest creditor and San Bernardino’s unfunded pension obligations to the fund amount to $143.3 million, according to Reuters. Wall Street bondholders follow CalPERS as the city’s second biggest creditor, owning roughly $50 million in bonds.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.