
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comPartner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comU.S. regulators said on Aug. 5 that 11 that big banks in the U.S. still do not have viable plans for filing for protection under the bankruptcy law that would avoid causing widespread economic damage.
Both the FDIC and the Federal Reserve have said that the bankruptcy plans submitted by the 11 largest banks rely on “unrealistic or inadequately supported” assumptions, Time magazine reported. The regulatory bodies assert that big banks’ plans do not outline changes in firm structure that would allow the U.S. to avoid broader economic repercussions.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act requires big banks to submit an annual “living will” that would allow for bankruptcy proceedings that don’t necessitate billions of dollars in taxpayer money. This law was enacted in the shadow of the 2007-08 financial crisis, which necessitated exactly that.
“Too big to fail is alive and well,” Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said in a statement, according to The Wall Street Journal. “The FDIC’s statement that these living wills are not credible means that megabanks will live on taxpayer life support in the event of a crash.” Brown has proposed legislation that would dramatically increase the capital requirements on the largest banks.
The findings applied to the 11 banks with U.S. assets greater than $250 billion, the news source explained. These included Bank of America Corp, Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, State Street Corp., Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG and the U.S. units of Barclays PLC.
Representatives of these big banks declined to give the Journal a statement or had no immediate comment at press time. The Financial Services Forum told the news source that banks are safer now than they were pre-crisis, and that “the industry remains strongly committed to ensuring the financial system is less complex, safe, transparent, accountable and capable of fulfilling its role of promoting economic growth and weathering substantial stress scenarios without taxpayer dollars being at risk.”
As a bankruptcy attorney, I’ve always followed the day-to-day of larger banks. Check out some of my previous posts on the subject:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
U.S. regulators said on Aug. 5 that 11 that big banks in the U.S. still do not have viable plans for filing for protection under the bankruptcy law that would avoid causing widespread economic damage.
Both the FDIC and the Federal Reserve have said that the bankruptcy plans submitted by the 11 largest banks rely on “unrealistic or inadequately supported” assumptions, Time magazine reported. The regulatory bodies assert that big banks’ plans do not outline changes in firm structure that would allow the U.S. to avoid broader economic repercussions.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act requires big banks to submit an annual “living will” that would allow for bankruptcy proceedings that don’t necessitate billions of dollars in taxpayer money. This law was enacted in the shadow of the 2007-08 financial crisis, which necessitated exactly that.
“Too big to fail is alive and well,” Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said in a statement, according to The Wall Street Journal. “The FDIC’s statement that these living wills are not credible means that megabanks will live on taxpayer life support in the event of a crash.” Brown has proposed legislation that would dramatically increase the capital requirements on the largest banks.
The findings applied to the 11 banks with U.S. assets greater than $250 billion, the news source explained. These included Bank of America Corp, Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, State Street Corp., Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG and the U.S. units of Barclays PLC.
Representatives of these big banks declined to give the Journal a statement or had no immediate comment at press time. The Financial Services Forum told the news source that banks are safer now than they were pre-crisis, and that “the industry remains strongly committed to ensuring the financial system is less complex, safe, transparent, accountable and capable of fulfilling its role of promoting economic growth and weathering substantial stress scenarios without taxpayer dollars being at risk.”
As a bankruptcy attorney, I’ve always followed the day-to-day of larger banks. Check out some of my previous posts on the subject:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!