Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Bank of America Says Countrywide Bankruptcy Remains an Option
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 25, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Bank of America is playing hardball with its Countrywide Financial unit, and recently raised the possibility of putting Countrywide into bankruptcy only two years after reaching a landmark $8.5 billion settlement with mortgage investors.
Countrywide, which struggled to stay afloat following a swarm of mortgage-related litigation after the housing market collapse, was purchased by Bank of America in 2008. However, the mortgage company’s legal issues are far from over, and institutional investors are now challenging the $8.5 billion settlement, claiming that the amount is inadequate.
Currently, AIG and other investors are asking the court to reject the settlement, which they called a “pennies-on-the-dollar bargain” for the bank, Bloomberg reports. This is largely because many investors report their total losses to be upwards of $100 billion.
At a court hearing in New York, Bank of America’s chief risk officer Terrence Laughlin said that recent talks with mortgage investors were “very tense” and combative, with both sides taking “very strong positions,” according to Bloomberg.
“I thought they were being extremely aggressive and one-sided in what they thought future losses would be coming out of these trusts,” Laughlin told the news source. “The investors were putting forth a very negative scenario. They were trying to put forth a high loss number [to reach a higher settlement.]”
If resolution talks fail and the bank does not win court approval for the settlement, seeking bankruptcy law protection for Countrywide may be a viable option.
“One of the options that was available to us and continues to be available to us was to put Countrywide into bankruptcy,” Laughlin said at the hearing.
While a handful of investors continue to lobby for a higher settlement amount, there are several investors that are in support of the existing terms and conditions, including Pacific Investment Management Co., Goldman Sachs Asset Management, and MetLife Inc.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
New York NDA Requirements for Businesses
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher
New Jersey Will Contest Grounds Explained
How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Legal Issues Before Bringing on Investors
Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher
SECURE 2.0 RMD Planning Strategies
How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer
Buying Commercial Property in New Jersey: Legal Guide for Small Businesses
Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities
On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.