Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Bank of America Says Countrywide Bankruptcy Remains an Option
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 25, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Bank of America is playing hardball with its Countrywide Financial unit, and recently raised the possibility of putting Countrywide into bankruptcy only two years after reaching a landmark $8.5 billion settlement with mortgage investors.
Countrywide, which struggled to stay afloat following a swarm of mortgage-related litigation after the housing market collapse, was purchased by Bank of America in 2008. However, the mortgage company’s legal issues are far from over, and institutional investors are now challenging the $8.5 billion settlement, claiming that the amount is inadequate.
Currently, AIG and other investors are asking the court to reject the settlement, which they called a “pennies-on-the-dollar bargain” for the bank, Bloomberg reports. This is largely because many investors report their total losses to be upwards of $100 billion.
At a court hearing in New York, Bank of America’s chief risk officer Terrence Laughlin said that recent talks with mortgage investors were “very tense” and combative, with both sides taking “very strong positions,” according to Bloomberg.
“I thought they were being extremely aggressive and one-sided in what they thought future losses would be coming out of these trusts,” Laughlin told the news source. “The investors were putting forth a very negative scenario. They were trying to put forth a high loss number [to reach a higher settlement.]”
If resolution talks fail and the bank does not win court approval for the settlement, seeking bankruptcy law protection for Countrywide may be a viable option.
“One of the options that was available to us and continues to be available to us was to put Countrywide into bankruptcy,” Laughlin said at the hearing.
While a handful of investors continue to lobby for a higher settlement amount, there are several investors that are in support of the existing terms and conditions, including Pacific Investment Management Co., Goldman Sachs Asset Management, and MetLife Inc.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
Commercial Real Estate Trends to Watch in 2026
Commercial real estate trends in 2026 are being shaped by shifting economic conditions, technological innovation, and evolving tenant demands. As the market adjusts to changing interest rates, capital flows, and workplace models, investors, owners, tenants, and developers must understand how these trends are influencing opportunities and risk in the year ahead. Overall Outlook for Commercial […]
Author: Michael J. Willner
One Big Beautiful Bill: New Tip Income Tax Rules Employers & Workers Need to Know
Part 2 – Tips Excluded from Income Certain employees and independent contractors may be eligible to deduct tips from their income for tax years 2025 through 2028 under provisions included in the One Big Beautiful Bill. The deduction is capped at $25,000 per year and begins to phase out at $150,000 of modified adjusted gross […]
Author: Scott H. Novak
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.