Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 26, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn recent years, college athletes being paid to play has become a major topic of conversation. In fact, I have been asked to speak on this issue at a number of recent events. One of the biggest discussions is expected to be on whether or not NCAA athletes should be paid or compensated for play. With the amount of money made by some athletic programs – USA Today reported the University of Texas brought in $163.3 million in 2011-12 – it would seem like a no brainer – but nothing is ever that easy.
For one, critics of pay-for-play claim that athletes already receive priceless compensation in return for their services – a free education. Leaving school without any student loan debt is certainly desirable, but what happens if a basketball player who was expected to be drafted in the first round gets hurt during the year in which he is required to play in college before jumping to the NBA?
Sure, that player can get insurance while in school, but they have to pay for that policy themselves and it isn’t guaranteed to cover the potential of lost wages. A good first step could be for the NCAA to offer these policies free of charge so there is some protection in place for start athletes while participating in amateur athletics.
Perhaps the biggest issue facing pay-for-play is Title IX, which explicitly states that schools receiving federal funds need to provide females with equal opportunity to compete in sports. So, how does this impact paying college athletes? Essentially, it means that if you are going to pay someone like Johnny Manziel, you also have to compensate a second stringer on the women’s lacrosse team.
The NCAA seems adamant about not paying athletes no matter what, but I don’t think this will be the last we hear about pay-for-play.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!