Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Are Politicians Allowed to Use Songs Without Permission?

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: July 7, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

Every four years or so, a few musicians cause a stir when their music is played at political rallies as politicians often use songs without permission.

Often times, any legal threats dissipate before they make it to court, but if a judge were to rule on such a case, there’s a chance the politician could be the favorite to prevail.

As election season kicks off again, another musician has protested the use of one of his songs at a campaign rally. Businessman, Donald Trump, recently announced his own candidacy for president of the United States, and during the event, he blared Neil Young’s “Rockin’ in the Free World.” Young did not approve. There has been speculation over whether the musician will take legal action against Trump for the use of his song, but this discussion isn’t a new one.

Other incidents

In 2008, Jackson Browne, Jon Bon Jovi, Heart, Foo Fighters, Van Halen and John Mellencamp were among the artists who complained about the use of their songs at McCain-Palin events, The Hollywood Reporter explained. Rapper K’Naan wasn’t happy with Mitt Romney using one of his songs in 2012 – the same year that Michele Bachmann received a letter from Tom Petty over his “American Girl.”

As fiercely as these crops of musicians pop up each election cycle to protest the use of their songs, they often disappear. Politicians offer to stop using the songs, settlements are reached and, as a result, there isn’t much legal precedent for whether a musician would actually win a lawsuit over the use of his or her song at a campaign. When it comes to commercials, politicians do have to get permission from artists, according to ASCAP guidelines. However, the use of songs at campaign rallies is less clear.

Chuck DeVore suit

One case between a candidate and a musician did end with a judge’s opinion, and though it differs slightly from instances of politicians using music at rallies, the opinion does offer some insight into how a lawsuit would progress – and it may not end well for the musician.

In 2010, Don Henley won a lawsuit against California senatorial candidate, Chuck DeVore, and campaign manager, Justin Hart, over their use of two of his songs. To be clear, there are significant differences between Henley’s suit and the one Young would file against Trump, if he decided to of course. DeVore took two of the former Eagles members’ songs and rewrote the lyrics in a satirical manner to reflect his campaign messages. This, of course, wasn’t a fair use of copyright, and Henley won the case. However, the judge was a bit more dismissive of the musician’s arguments regarding the Lanham Act.

The act prohibits “false designations of origin, false representations and false representations in the advertising and sale of goods and services,” according to the summary judgment for Don Henley et. al v. Chuck DeVore et al. False endorsement has been recognized under the Lanham Act for unpermitted copying of “distinctive attributes where those attributes amount to an unregistered commercial trademark.”

Other factors to consider

In this case, the defendants argued that the songs used did not contain any of the “distinctive attributes” that would constitute a trademark, such as “a word, symbol or device” used to identify or distinguish them. Additionally, the court found that DeVore and Hart were not attempting to pass the songs off as actually performed by Henley. If they had been attempting to convince people that Henley had sung the song, then their commercials would have violated the Lanham Act.

Still, politicians who wish to use certain songs in their campaigns should be smart about how they do it. For example, checking to see if the venue has a blanket license to use songs is a wise move, NPR explained. While most larger locations do have such licenses, smaller venues may not, making it illegal to play some songs at them. Also, musicians might claim that their brand is being hurt by politicians’ use of their songs. While this argument is tenuous, NPR noted, it is best to avoid such situations. For advice on whether to use a song during a campaign, or whether a song has been used illegally, it would be helpful to consult an attorney with experience in these areas.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"
SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know post image

SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know

Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "SPACs Are Back, What You Need to Know"
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses post image

Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses

Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses"
Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress post image

Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress

The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]

Author: Brian D. Spector

Link to post with title - "Tariff Response Options for Small Businesses Facing Financial Distress"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!