Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 19, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn good news for New Jersey businesses, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court recently held that a Quick Chek was not liable for a customer’s injuries after she slipped on a phone card while exiting the store. The court refused to extend the “mode of operation” doctrine, which makes it easier to prove a premises liability claim.
The Facts of the Case
In Arroyo v. Durling Realty, Jacquelin Arroyo filed a personal injury claim against the owner of a Quick Chek convenience store in Wantage, New Jersey. The plaintiff alleges that she slipped on a discarded telephone calling card, which was on the sidewalk near the store entrance, and injured her knee.
Arroyo argues that presence of the plastic card on the sidewalk created an unreasonably dangerous condition. In support of her liability claim against the New Jersey business, she notes that the phone cards are displayed near the store’s cash register and the exit doors, making it foreseeable that the purchased cards would be taken out of the store, immediately used, and discarded on the sidewalk.
In its defense, the store’s manager testified that the front of the store is swept for debris ten to fifteen times daily, while the entire front sidewalk and parking lot are swept twice each day. There was no evidence that store employees were aware of the presence of the card on the sidewalk prior to the accident.
To prove her premises liability claims, the plaintiff relied on the “mode of operation doctrine,” which eliminates the need to prove actual or constructive notice where, “as a matter of probability, a dangerous condition is likely to occur as the result of the nature of the business, the property’s condition, or a demonstrable pattern of conduct or incidents.” In these type of case, the burden shifts to the defendant to produce rebutting proof that it had taken prudent and reasonable steps to avoid the potential hazard
The Court’s Decision
The Appellate Division ultimately upheld the decision of the lower court to dismiss the suit on summary judgment based on the finding that the defendant did not have actual or constructive notice of the presence of the discarded phone card on the sidewalk. The panel further agreed that it was not appropriate to impose mode-of-operation liability.
As noted in the opinion, previous cases applying the doctrine involved “a mode of operation designed to allow the patron to select and remove the merchandise from the premises without intervention from any employee of the storekeeper.” In this case, “[t]he patron who presumably bought the phone card would have had to take it off the display rack, present it to a cashier at checkout, had the card activated by the cashier, and paid for the card before taking it out of the store. The nexus between the self-service rack and the eventual presence of the card on the sidewalk outside is extremely attenuated,” the court explained.
The court also concluded that the convenience store’s “method of doing business” could not reasonably be assumed to create the hazard encountered by plaintiff on the sidewalk. The panel noted that “what the purchaser chose to do with the card after leaving the store was not an integral feature of the store’s retail operation,” and that purchasers would not necessarily through the card away immediately.
Thus, the decision suggests that the doctrine will remain limited to traditional self-service operations, such as supermarkets and cafeterias.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Christine Vanek, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
NYC Real Estate and Litigation Attorney Ryan O. Miller and Team Join Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC New York City, NY – August 13, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has strengthened its Real Estate and Litigation practices with the addition of four New York City-based attorneys. Ryan Miller, who joins as a partner, is well known for […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Business law plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of running a successful enterprise, from negotiating a commercial lease to drafting employee policies to fulfilling corporate disclosure obligations. Understanding what is business law and your legal obligations can help your business run smoothly and build productive relationships with clients, business partners, regulators, and others. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!